Running News Daily

The women’s 800m at the 2026 European Athletics Championships is reaching a thrilling stage, with Keely Hodgkinson of Great Britain and Femke Broeders-Bol of the Netherlands set to meet in the second semi-final in Birmingham today. With a place in Friday’s final at stake, the pressure is rising—and the quality of the field promises a fascinating two-lap battle.

Hodgkinson laid down an early marker in the heats, producing a commanding 1:57.28 to become the fastest qualifier. The British Olympic champion looked comfortable throughout her race, underlining both her sharpness and confidence as she continues her bid for another European 800m title on home soil.

Broeders-Bol also progressed with little difficulty, stopping the clock at 1:59.96. Best known for her achievements over the 400m hurdles, the Dutch star has developed into an increasingly intriguing presence over 800m, bringing speed and versatility to a race packed with established middle-distance talent.

The semi-final will also feature Audrey Werro of Switzerland, whose presence adds another layer of danger to an already compelling contest. The Swiss star has enjoyed a remarkable season and recently produced 1:53.98, the third-fastest time in history, before also progressing safely through the Birmingham heats in 1:57.83.

What makes this showdown particularly fascinating is the contrasting strengths of the leading contenders. Hodgkinson possesses immense championship experience and has repeatedly shown that she thrives when the pressure is at its highest. Werro brings extraordinary speed and the confidence of having recently defeated Hodgkinson in Stockholm, while Broeders-Bol’s transition from the 400m hurdles to the two-lap event gives her a distinctive blend of speed, strength and tactical versatility.

With the final only one day away, there is little room for error. The opening lap, positioning and the ability to unleash a decisive surge in the closing metres could determine who advances. Every stride will matter as the contenders fight not only for qualification, but also for momentum heading into the championship showdown.

For Hodgkinson, the Birmingham stage offers another opportunity to turn home support into a memorable performance. For Broeders-Bol and Werro, it is a chance to challenge one of the event’s most decorated figures and prove that the European 800m crown is anything but predictable.

The ingredients are perfect: speed, experience, ambition and a place in the final on the line. Birmingham is ready for another spectacular 800m battle. 

The Tokyo Marathon 2027 is set to become a landmark edition as the race celebrates its 20th anniversary, and organisers have unveiled a special finisher medal designed to commemorate the occasion. 

Scheduled for Sunday, March 7, 2027, the 20th edition will feature a Premium Edition Finisher Medal created specifically to mark two decades of the Tokyo Marathon.

The commemorative medal is an impressive 100 millimetres in diameter, making it an extra-large version befitting such a significant milestone.

At the centre of the front design is a striking graphical interpretation of the number “20”, symbolising the 20th edition and giving the medal a distinctive anniversary identity.

The reverse side carries an equally meaningful design, featuring representative buildings and landmarks located along the Tokyo Marathon course. The imagery captures the character of Tokyo while expressing the marathon’s role in connecting people and cultures from around the world.

Importantly, the special medal will not be reserved for elite athletes or a select group of runners. Every runner who successfully completes the Tokyo Marathon 2027 will receive the 20th-anniversary Premium Edition Finisher Medal, giving every finisher a lasting memento of their achievement.

The medal unveiling adds another layer of excitement to an already highly anticipated edition of the race. For runners, it will represent not only the completion of 42.195 kilometres through one of the world’s most recognisable cities, but also their place in a significant chapter of Tokyo Marathon history.

With its combination of the bold “20” anniversary design, Tokyo landmarks and oversized 100mm format, the medal is set to become one of the most distinctive finisher medals in the event’s history.

As anticipation builds toward March 7, 2027, runners now have another special reason to chase the finish line in Tokyo: the chance to earn a medal created specifically for the marathon’s 20th-anniversary celebration.

Twenty editions. One iconic city. One unforgettable finish. 

The women’s 800m semifinals at the 2026 European Athletics Championships in Birmingham produced a dramatic sequence of events, with Keely Hodgkinson strengthening her title credentials and Audrey Werro receiving a remarkable reprieve after a late-race fall.

Hodgkinson delivered a composed and powerful performance in the second semifinal, winning in 1:57.38 to book her place in the final. The British favorite was pushed hard by the Netherlands’ Femke Broeders-Bol, who finished just 0.08 seconds behind in 1:57.46.

Italy’s Eloisa Coiro followed in 1:57.74, while Switzerland’s Valentina Rosamilia and France’s Clara Liberman advanced as time qualifiers after clocking 1:58.16 and 1:58.19, respectively.

Jemma Reekie also looked strong, securing automatic qualification in 1:58.61, with France’s Anaïs Bourgoin and Switzerland’s Veronica Vancardo joining her after finishing in 1:58.84 and 1:59.14.

But it was the opening semifinal that produced the most extraordinary moment of the night.

With just 150 metres remaining, Switzerland’s Audrey Werro was suddenly involved in a dramatic incident that appeared to end her race and potentially her championship.

As the runners entered the closing stages, Werro’s right foot made contact with the left hand of France’s Anaïs Bourgoin. The contact disrupted Werro’s stride at a crucial moment, causing the Swiss athlete to lose her balance and tumble heavily.

For several tense moments, it appeared that Werro’s hopes of reaching the final had disappeared. She eventually crossed the finish line in 2:35.35, far outside the qualifying times, after the fall had cost her significant ground.

But the drama did not end at the finish line.

Following a review of the incident, the referees determined that Werro had been impeded and advanced her to the women’s 800m final.

The decision gives the Swiss star a remarkable second chance. What initially looked like a devastating end to her semifinal has instead turned into one of the most dramatic qualification stories of the championships.

Lithuania’s Gabija Galvydyte was also advanced by referee decision after finishing in 2:03.59, meaning the final will feature an unusual 10-athlete field.

Women’s 800m Final Qualifiers

1. Keely Hodgkinson (Great Britain) — 1:57.38 Q

2. Femke Broeders-Bol (Netherlands) — 1:57.46 Q

3. Eloisa Coiro (Italy) — 1:57.74 Q

4. Valentina Rosamilia (Switzerland) — 1:58.16 q

5. Clara Liberman (France) — 1:58.19 q

6. Jemma Reekie (Great Britain) — 1:58.61 Q

7. Anaïs Bourgoin (France) — 1:58.84 Q

8. Veronica Vancardo (Switzerland) — 1:59.14 Q

9. Gabija Galvydyte (Lithuania) — 2:03.59 qR

10. Audrey Werro (Switzerland) — 2:35.35 qR

Q = qualified automatically

q = qualified by time

qR= advanced by referee decision

Werro’s reinstatement has completely changed the complexion of the final. Instead of watching the championship from the sidelines after a heartbreaking fall, the Swiss athlete will return to the track with another opportunity to fight for a place on the podium.

Hodgkinson, meanwhile, heads into the final with the fastest semifinal time and renewed confidence. But with Broeders-Bol, Reekie, Coiro and the rest of the field ready to challenge, the European 800m title is still firmly up for grabs.

After one of the most dramatic semifinals of the championships, 10 athletes will now line up for the final — and Werro will be among them.

The women’s field for the 2026 BMW BERLIN-MARATHON is rapidly developing into one of the most intriguing marathon line-ups of the year, bringing together world-class champions, established contenders and an exciting collection of athletes determined to make their mark on one of the sport’s fastest stages.

At the forefront is Ethiopia’s Tigst Assefa, whose extraordinary marathon career has already placed her among the all-time greats. Assefa is the current women-only marathon world-record holder, having improved her own mark to 2:15:41 at the 2026 TCS London Marathon, where she successfully defended her title.

Her place in marathon history was secured even earlier in Berlin. At the 2023 BMW BERLIN-MARATHON, Assefa stormed to 2:11:53, smashing the then women’s world record by more than two minutes. The performance was subsequently ratified by World Athletics and remains among the fastest women’s marathon ever recorded in a mixed-gender race.

Kenya’s Rosemary Wanjiru, with a 2:16:14 personal best, provides another formidable presence at the sharp end of the race, while Ethiopia’s Bedatu Hirpa adds yet another major threat to an already exceptional field.

The 27-year-old Hirpa has built an impressive marathon résumé in a remarkably short period. She owns a 2:18:27 personal best, achieved when she won the Dubai Marathon, before continuing her winning momentum with victory at the Paris Marathon just months later. She also underlined her consistency this year with a second-place finish at the Osaka Marathon in 2:19:54. With her combination of speed, confidence and major-marathon experience, Hirpa could be one of the athletes capable of challenging the leading names in Berlin.

The Ethiopian challenge does not end there. Dera Dida (2:18:32), Zeineba Yimer (2:18:47), Bosena Mulatie (2:19:00), Misgane Alemayehu (2:19:08), Bekelech Gudeta (2:19:39), Gadise Mulu (2:20:59), Eebbisee Addunya (2:21:13) and Aminet Ahmed (2:21:24) give Ethiopia extraordinary depth, with every one of them boasting a personal best inside 2:22.

Kenya will also have strong representation through Evaline Chirchir (2:20:33) and Pascaline Jelagat (2:22:44), adding further firepower to a nation renowned for producing world-class marathon talent. China’s Deshun Zhang (2:20:53) also brings a sub-2:21 credential to the starting line.

Japan arrives with a deep group of proven marathoners. Rika Kaseda (2:21:55), Mao Uesugi (2:22:11), Natsuki Omori (2:23:45) and Rino Goshima (2:24:44) all possess impressive personal bests and could play an important role as the race develops. Morocco’s Fatima Gardadi (2:24:06) adds another strong international presence, while France’s Manon Trapp (2:23:38), the United States’ Jacqueline Gaughan (2:24:40) and Kodi Kleven (2:24:48), and Great Britain’s Lucy Reid (2:26:37) further strengthen the international depth.

Germany will have plenty to cheer for on home soil, with a sizeable contingent led by Kristina Hendel (2:27:29), who will be looking to rediscover the form that made her one of the country’s leading marathoners. After injury setbacks interrupted her progress, Hendel returns with the ambition of rebuilding her momentum on one of the biggest stages in the sport.

Anna Langerwisch is another German athlete attracting considerable interest. The 24-year-old has emerged rapidly among the country’s promising marathoners, winning the Hanover Half Marathon in 70:53 before improving her marathon personal best to 2:32:13 in Prague, remarkably in only her second marathon. Her recent 32:17 over 10 kilometres at the adidas Runners City Night in early August has added further intrigue around what she might produce over the full marathon distance.

Germany’s depth extends further, with Thea Heim (2:33:25), Cara Zol­lenkopf (2:36:05), Esther Pfeiffer (2:37:00), Katja Fischer (2:40:13), Sophia Wunsch (2:40:49) and Jule Vetter (2:42:18) also listed for the race. Their presence gives the home nation a broad representation across the field and adds another layer to an already fascinating international contest.

With Assefa’s extraordinary pedigree, Wanjiru’s proven class, Hirpa’s growing reputation and a supporting cast filled with athletes boasting sub-2:25 credentials, Berlin is shaping up for a women’s race packed with possibilities.

For Assefa, the return to Berlin carries an added historical dimension. It was on these very streets in 2023 that she produced the 2:11:53 performance that changed the landscape of women’s marathon running. Now, after lowering the women-only world record to 2:15:41 in London, she returns with another opportunity to write a new chapter in her remarkable career.

For the established stars, Berlin will be a chance to reaffirm their place among the marathon elite; for the emerging contenders, it could be the moment they announce themselves on one of the sport’s grandest stages.

The BMW BERLIN-MARATHON is renowned for fast racing and ambitious performances, and with such remarkable depth already assembled, the 2026 edition promises to deliver a captivating battle from the opening kilometres to the iconic finish on the Straße des 17. Juni.

Kenya’s Beatrice Chepkoech is set to bring her world-class pedigree to the inaugural Antrim Coast 5K on Sunday, August 23, with the world 3000m steeplechase record holder targeting a remarkable sub-15-minute performance on the fast Northern Irish course.

For Chepkoech, the race represents more than another appearance on the road. It is an opportunity to test her speed and endurance over 5 kilometres while pursuing a time that would underline the extraordinary range of one of Kenya’s most accomplished distance athletes.

The former world champion has built her reputation through years of excellence on the track, most notably in the 3000m steeplechase, where her world-record performance established her among the finest athletes the event has ever produced. Her move to the Antrim Coast 5K adds another intriguing chapter to her already distinguished career.

A sub-15-minute clocking would be a significant statement on the road, particularly given the calibre of athlete attempting it. Chepkoech will arrive with the experience, competitive instinct and proven finishing speed required to make the challenge compelling, while the fast nature of the Antrim Coast course could provide the ideal platform for an ambitious performance.

However, the Kenyan star will not have the spotlight to herself.

The men’s race is expected to provide its own major attraction, with Ethiopia’s Ermais Girma among the headline names in a strong international field. His presence adds further depth to an event designed to bring together elite athletes and ambitious teams on a course where fast racing is expected to be at the heart of the action.

Ireland and Scotland will also add an international dimension, fielding teams that will turn the inaugural event into much more than a straightforward individual contest. With athletes competing for personal ambitions while representing their respective teams, the Antrim Coast 5K promises a fascinating race within a race.

For Chepkoech, though, the equation is simple: arrive ready, embrace the pace and chase the clock.

A sub-15-minute performance would give the Kenyan superstar another impressive mark to her name and provide a fitting headline for the first edition of the Antrim Coast 5K. With her reputation for attacking races and her ability to deliver under pressure, all eyes will be on Chepkoech when the field takes to the fast Antrim Coast course.

Sunday’s race could therefore become an important showcase of just how much speed remains in the legs of one of Kenya’s most celebrated champions—and whether Chepkoech can turn her bold sub-15 ambition into reality.

By Bob Anderson, Founder of KATA

I wanted Charles Ngeno to succeed.

That is important to say at the beginning because this didn’t start as a fight. It started with trust.

In June 2025, Kenyan coach Charles Ngeno joined our KATA program. I agreed to loan him money to establish two KATA Running Camps and grow six acres of potatoes in Kenya. 

The idea was straightforward. KATA would provide the startup capital. Charles would operate the camps and potato farms. The potatoes would generate revenue, our loan would be repaid, profits would be shared according to our agreement, and the operation could become increasingly self-supporting.

Instead, Catherine and I ultimately advanced Charles 1,077,500 Kenyan shillings.

As of August 12, 2026, according to our records, Charles has repaid:

Zero.

Not one shilling.

And when I asked him again on August 12 when he was going to start paying back the loan, his response included:

“Let’s meet in centuries.”

He subsequently wrote:

“The time will come” 

After more than a year of promises, those words told me a lot.

I Was Warned About Charles

Shortly after entering into our agreement, people in Kenya began warning me about Charles.

I listened, but I also listened to Charles.

He called me regularly. We talked at length. He assured me that the things people said about him weren’t true. He presented himself as someone dedicated to helping young Kenyan athletes.

I chose to give him a chance.

Looking back, I believe Charles took advantage of that trust.

The important thing now is not what Charles says about me or what I say about him. It is what the written record shows.

And we have a substantial written record.

Charles Himself Called It a Loan

There should be no confusion now about whether this money was a gift.

It wasn’t.

My WhatsApp correspondence repeatedly describes these payments as loans, and Charles himself used exactly that word.

By September 29, 2025, I wrote to Charles:

“I have sent you 959,000 against your loan of 650k for your two camps and 600k for your six acres.”

Charles did not respond that the money wasn’t a loan.

Quite the opposite.

On October 7, while asking me for another 21,000 KES, Charles wrote:

“Then I will be knowing that my total loan is 1000000ksh.”

Two days later he made it even clearer:

“With this support, my total loan will now stand at Ksh 1,000,000.”

Those are Charles Ngeno’s words, not mine.

The Requests for Money Just Kept Coming

The pattern became remarkably consistent.

Charles would describe progress.

Then he would ask for more money.

On September 15 he told me he had planted the remaining quarter acre and said the 20,000 KES I had just sent had helped him.

Then came:

“Please send me 25k. Now.”

On October 3 he said his Nakuru camp rent was urgent and warned:

“Its very embarrassing to have my KATA camp closed.”

He urged Catherine and me to continue funding him, saying we had completed “90% journey” and shouldn’t stop with only 10 percent remaining.

On October 7 he predicted a very substantial potato harvest:

“Bob for my first harvest I’m expecting to have more than 150 bags of 50kg.”

He added:

“i promise good return.”

On October 21, as harvest approached, there was another request:

“Bob. Please send me 15k for olenguruone camp.”

On October 26, Charles said he needed another 28,000 KES to pay cooks at both camps and top up the Nakuru operation.

I sent it.

Two days later, after telling Charles that KATA existed to train, house and feed athletes and that potato revenue was supposed to support the operation, Charles wrote:

“Bob i do respect you. You really uplift me. I will assure you that all will be well.”

Four minutes later he asked me for another 5,000 KES.

This went on and on.

Eventually I stopped the bleed.

Where Were the Returns?

By October, potatoes were supposedly approaching harvest.

Charles gave me specific projected harvest dates.

He told me his first harvest would produce more than 150 bags of 50 kilograms.

I repeatedly explained how the money was supposed to work.

Potatoes would be harvested and sold. Sale proceeds would first go into the KATA account. The appropriate portion of the original farming loan would be recovered. The remaining profit would then be divided according to our agreement.

I wasn’t trying to take Charles’s livelihood away from him.

The opposite was true.

I wanted the operation to succeed so Charles could make money, KATA could recover its capital, athletes could be supported and the money could be recycled into additional farming.

But when harvest time arrived, getting money back became increasingly difficult.

In November, when I asked when funds would be transferred to our Equity Bank account in Kenya, Charles answered:

“When the potatoes market will show fairness in price.for now all has to wait.”

He later wrote:

“as soon as I sell potatoes, I will ask for bank account.”

But there was another revealing sentence:

“Untill I see there is return, I will sell. Else for now not yet.”

The person who had enthusiastically accepted our money was now deciding on his own when the crop financed by that money would be sold.

I Kept Giving Him the Benefit of the Doubt

This is perhaps the part that bothers me most.

Every time something didn’t add up, I wanted to believe there was an explanation.

When others questioned Charles, he frequently suggested that they were enemies trying to damage him.

At one point, after I asked for basic proof of his camps and potato operation, Charles told me:

“I know who is behind all this.”

He said the person was a “pure enemy” and told me:

“I only expect communication from you directly.”

That should have been another warning sign.

Instead of welcoming independent verification of an operation financed with our money, Charles repeatedly tried to turn questions about documentation into questions about the motives of the people asking them.

I nevertheless continued working with him.

There Was Another History I Should Have Examined More Closely

I also later learned much more about a serious controversy involving Charles a decade earlier.

In 2015, Kenyan media reported allegations by Athletics Kenya officials concerning Charles and young female athletes at the Keringet training camp.

The allegations were extremely serious.

Charles denied them.

Contemporary reporting said Athletics Kenya announced a lifetime ban and ordered the camp closed amid allegations involving manipulation and improper relationships with female athletes.

Charles publicly disputed the accusations and said they were rumors intended to tarnish his name.

Those allegations should not be presented as proven facts simply because they were published.

But they were serious enough that I wish I had investigated the entire episode much more carefully before trusting Charles with our money.

Charles has also had genuine accomplishments as a coach, and athletes associated with Keringet have achieved considerable success. That is part of his history too.

None of that, however, answers the question before us today:

What happened to KATA’s 1,077,500 KES, and when will it be repaid?

From Promises to “Let’s Meet in Centuries”

For months I received assurances.

Charles told me:

“I’m promising you will see the Impact.”

He promised a “good return.”

He told me:

“I will assure you that all will be well.”

He acknowledged in writing that the money was a loan.

He told me how much that loan totaled.

He gave us projected harvest dates.

He predicted more than 150 bags from his first harvest.

And at one point he assured me that he would repay 400,000 KES.

That payment never arrived.

Eventually the total amount Catherine and I advanced reached 1,077,500 KES.

According to our records:

Money advanced: 1,077,500 KES

Money repaid: 0 KES

Outstanding: 1,077,500 KES

Then, on August 12, 2026, after I again asked when he was going to start paying back the loan, I got:

“Let’s meet in centuries.”

For me, that was the end of the excuses.

Charles Ngeno Has the Opportunity to Answer

I am publishing this because other people considering financial dealings with Charles deserve to know what happened to us.

But Charles deserves the opportunity to respond as well.

So I am asking him publicly:

Did you receive 1,077,500 KES from us?

Do you acknowledge that this money was advanced under our KATA loan arrangement?

How much money did the six acres of potatoes actually produce?

Where did the proceeds go?

What happened to the two KATA camps we financed?

Why have you not repaid a single shilling?

What happened to the 400,000 KES you said you would repay?

And finally:

When are you going to repay the 1,077,500 KES?

Charles doesn’t need to answer with another promise.

He doesn’t need to tell me that “the time will come.”

And he certainly doesn’t need to tell me:

“Let’s meet in centuries.”

He can answer with something much simpler 

A payment.

Until that happens, I believe people dealing financially with Charles Ngeno deserve to see the record and make up their own minds.

We trusted him.

We funded him.

We waited.

Now we are making the record public.