Running News Daily

KATA had assembled 30 running camps and planned to double that number. Its model used repayable, interest-free startup financing and potato farming to create a self-sustaining national network—but the expected repayments never materialized.

By Robert Kibet

Could a network of 60 self-supporting training camps have transformed life for 1,800 promising Kenyan runners?

That was the vision behind the Kenyan Athletics Training Academy (KATA) programme created by Bob and Catherine Anderson.

KATA had assembled 30 running camps and planned to expand to at least 60. At 30 athletes per camp, the completed network could have provided accommodation, food and high-level training for approximately 1,800 runners at one time.

The objective was not simply to produce champions. KATA sought to improve daily living and training conditions for developing athletes while strengthening grassroots coaching.

The programme was ambitious, but it was not intended to depend permanently upon money from the Andersons.

(These eight photographs were among more than 5,000 images sent to KATA founder Bob Anderson and his team as evidence of how the programme was progressing.

The photographs showed why individual coaches and camp operators believed they should receive interest-free loans and become part of the KATA family. Others documented the development of the camps, potato farming activities and the required 10-kilometre time trials held every two months.

In September 2025, athletes from most of the 30 KATA camps travelled to Thika to compete in the KATA Double Road Race, where KSh100,000 in prize money was awarded. At that point, the programme appeared to be working as planned.

The situation changed shortly afterward. Potato harvests were completed and crops were sold, but despite repeated explanations and delays, very little of the money collected was returned to KATA.)

How a camp was supposed to become self-supporting

KATA’s financial model began with two interest-free loans.

The first supplied the capital required to open a running camp. An approved operator could receive as much as KSh500,000 for rent, beds, mattresses, furniture, food and other startup needs.

That money remained a debt to KATA. It was not a gift, grant or donation.

A second interest-free loan financed potato cultivation at a projected cost of approximately KSh100,000 per acre.

The plan called for the harvest revenue to retire both debts—the farming advance and the camp-establishment advance—before the remaining proceeds were used locally.

Potatoes were chosen because they are Kenya’s second-most important food crop after maize and form an industry worth an estimated US$400 million to US$500 million annually.

KATA’s working projection placed gross sales from a successful acre at about KSh400,000. This was a programme estimate rather than a guaranteed or national average result. Actual returns depended upon production, disease, weather and selling prices.

The projected economics of three acres illustrate the plan:

Estimated cultivation loan: KSh300,000;

Projected gross sales: KSh1.2 million;

Repayment of cultivation financing: KSh300,000;

Repayment of camp startup financing: up to KSh500,000; and

Potential balance for athletes and the next season: approximately KSh400,000.

Under this model, one strong three-acre harvest could potentially clear the money advanced to establish the camp and grow the crop. The following season could then help pay for food, housing and training while keeping the farm productive.

“We did not give away startup money,” Anderson said. “We provided interest-free loans that had to be repaid. The potatoes were the engine intended to repay both loans and create continuing income for the athletes.”

From 30 camps to a potential 60

Bob and Catherine Anderson say they invested more than KSh42 million in the wider programme.

Approximately KSh36 million was provided as interest-free financing, with more than KSh6 million spent on Kenyan independent contractors and related operational expenses.

The Andersons did not form a Kenyan company. Their California-based operation directed the programme and retained independent contractors in Kenya for coordination and monitoring.

If 75 percent of participating coaches, farmers and operators had repaid their loans, Anderson believes KATA would have had enough revolving capital to strengthen the 30 camps and expand to 60.

“The money was supposed to keep moving,” he said. “A repayment from one harvest could help establish or strengthen another camp. We would not have needed to start again with new outside money every season.”

A 60-camp network supporting 1,800 runners could also have developed a significant voice within Kenyan athletics.

“KATA was not created to oppose Athletics Kenya,” Anderson said. “But an independent programme improving conditions for 1,800 athletes would naturally have carried influence.”

Anderson has wondered whether that potential might have concerned people who wanted to control opportunities within the sport. He emphasizes that he has no evidence Athletics Kenya attempted to undermine KATA.

Charles Ngeno and claims of high-level access

While developing two proposed KATA camps, coach Charles Ng’eno repeatedly portrayed himself to Anderson as closely connected to leading figures in Kenyan athletics.

On July 22, 2025, Ng’eno wrote:

“I need to brief you tomorrow about good news we discussed with AK PRESIDENT about KATA.”

The message did not explain the “good news,” and no response from the Athletics Kenya president has been provided to confirm that discussion.

Ng’eno also sent photographs appearing to show him attending Athletics Kenya functions, including one in which he sat behind an Athletics Kenya nameplate and another showing him addressing a gathering.

The photographs indicate attendance at athletics-related events. They do not prove that AK supported KATA or authorized Ng’eno to speak on its behalf.

Ng’eno also supplied Anderson with messages addressed to senior athletics official Barnabas Korir.

In one, Ng’eno told Korir:

“You expressed happiness with KATA.”

He further attributed to Korir statements about protecting KATA because of its importance in empowering young people.

The screenshots do not show Korir confirming the statements. It remains unclear whether all the communications were sent, received or answered.

Prominent athletes and coaches

Ng’eno strengthened the appearance of influence by invoking other respected names.

In June 2025, he sent Anderson a message addressed to Faith Kipyegon in which he described himself as her “grassroots coach.” The screenshot contains no response from Kipyegon and does not independently establish the extent of Ng’eno’s early coaching role.

Ng’eno later said prominent coach Bernard Rono had consulted him about KATA and joined the programme.

“We are glad to have him with us at KATA,” Anderson replied. “We have a strong group of operators!”

Anderson says the combined effect of the messages and AK photographs was significant.

“Charles made it appear that he was plugged into the highest levels of Kenyan athletics,” Anderson said. “That gave me confidence that he could build successful camps and bring respected people into the KATA network.”

Whether Ng’eno accurately described those relationships remains unconfirmed.

Two camps appeared to be taking shape

Ng’eno supported his requests for money with budgets, reports, photographs and videos.

After confirming receipt of KSh40,000 in June 2025, he sent a photograph of a truck at a residential property and said he was installing items at the camp.

He later requested financing for nearby land, reported renting a house in Nakuru and sought money for beds and mattresses.

On August 3, Ng’eno submitted figures for the proposed Olenguruone and Nakuru camps. His presentation referred to a combined KSh1.3 million budget and reported KSh531,400 used for farming and camp expenses.

The KSh1.3 million was the proposed allocation—not the amount Anderson ultimately transferred.

Anderson says Ng’eno actually received KSh1,077,500. The funding was intended to establish two camps and cultivate six acres.

A video Ng’eno sent on August 5 appeared to show young athletes training indoors.

“These are the real stars,” he wrote, predicting they could reach the next World Cross Country Championships.

The material led Anderson to believe the camps were progressing.

“I could see athletes training and equipment apparently arriving,” he said. “It looked as though the programme was creating exactly what we intended. 

Red flags halted further funding

Ng’eno continued presenting expansion plans, but promised repayments did not arrive.

In November 2025, he told Anderson nearly KSh600,000 would be paid before the end of December, followed by another KSh200,000 in January or February.

Ng’eno also referred to a plot of land allegedly worth KSh1.5 million that could be sold to clear the debt.

At the same time, he continued seeking additional money. When an account was restricted because no repayment had arrived, Ng’eno suggested that funds be sent through his wife’s M-Pesa number or another person.

Anderson refused to bypass the restriction.

In January 2026, Ng’eno made another commitment:

“Yes Bob, I need to start with 400,000 ksh.”

He said he was responsible and “must do payments.” He also attributed the delay to money spent constructing a residential building that would become a KATA camp.

Anderson says the KSh400,000 was not paid.

Ng’eno later attempted to persuade him to finance another six acres with approximately KSh600,000 in additional interest-free funding.

Anderson declined.

“I probably would have sent more if the promised repayments had started,” he said. “Fortunately, each missed date raised another red flag. I stopped after KSh1,077,500.”

What is known—and what remains unverified

The available communications show that Ng’eno:

Claimed to have discussed KATA with the Athletics Kenya president;

Attributed favorable statements about KATA to Barnabas Korir;

Presented himself as connected to leading athletes and coaches;

Supplied budgets and reports for two camps;

Sent images appearing to show camp development and athletes training;

Continued seeking new funding; and

Made several substantial repayment promises.

They do not establish whether Athletics Kenya endorsed or opposed KATA, whether the named officials made the statements attributed to them or how all the money was ultimately used.

There is no current evidence that Athletics Kenya developed or participated in a plan to stop KATA.

There is evidence that Ng’eno’s representations increased Anderson’s confidence in the camps and the wider programme.

Questions for Ng’eno and Athletics Kenya

Ng’eno should be asked:

What did he discuss with the Athletics Kenya president?

Did Barnabas Korir make the statements attributed to him?

What official athletics positions did Ng’eno hold?

How many athletes lived and trained at the two camps?

Was the residential building completed and operated as a KATA camp?

How was the KSh1,077,500 used?

What income was produced by the six acres?

Why were the promised repayments not made?

Did he own the reported KSh1.5 million property?

Athletics Kenya and the officials named in Ng’eno’s messages should have an opportunity to clarify what they knew about KATA and whether their positions were represented accurately.

Grand—but not impossible

KATA’s vision was undeniably large: 60 camps capable of supporting 1,800 runners.

Its financial premise was that repaid loans would become revolving capital. Each successful camp and harvest would help finance the next cycle of athlete support.

“The vision may have been grand, but it was not impossible,” Anderson said. “We already had 30 camps. What failed was the repayment system and our reliance on reports that were not independently verified.”

Whether Ng’eno truthfully described his Athletics Kenya discussions remains unanswered. Whether AK understood KATA’s potential scale is also unclear.

What is clear is that the programme was not offering free startup money. Every camp and agricultural advance was an interest-free loan that had to be returned.

Without those repayments, the revolving system stopped—and the planned network of 60 camps has never became a reality.  If only most of the KATA operators had paid back their loan! "When they do things could still get back on track," says Bob Anderson. 

Jakob Ingebrigtsen brought his remarkable 2026 season to a fitting close on home soil, winning the men’s street 1500m at the inaugural Runfest Norway in Sandnes on Friday.

Competing in front of an enthusiastic hometown crowd, the Olympic and world champion took control of the race from the early stages and maintained his authority through the finish, stopping the clock at 3:40.7.

Andreas Fjeld Halvorsen followed in second in 3:43.3, while Sigurd Tveit completed the podium in 3:47.8.

The unusual street race added another dimension to the occasion, with 273 runners taking part on the same road and sharing the course with one of Norway’s most accomplished distance runners. For the recreational participants, it offered a rare opportunity to compete alongside Ingebrigtsen in an event that brought elite athletics and mass participation together.

The victory also provided a fitting final chapter to a season that began with significant uncertainty for Ingebrigtsen. After undergoing major Achilles surgery in February, the Norwegian was forced to miss a substantial portion of the summer campaign as he worked his way back to full fitness.

His return, however, quickly developed into another championship-winning chapter. In Birmingham, Ingebrigtsen captured European 5,000m gold before adding another major title at the inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championship in Budapest, where he won the 5,000m.

Those performances transformed what could have been a disrupted season into another year defined by championship success and a determined return to the highest level.

Now, with the Sandnes victory added to his 2026 record, Ingebrigtsen closes the year exactly where it began in spirit — overcoming adversity, rebuilding his form and once again competing at the front.

From Achilles surgery in February to major championship victories and finally a 1500m win before his hometown crowd, the Norwegian has given his 2026 season a memorable final scene.

Olympic 100m hurdles champion Masai Russell has announced her engagement to longtime partner Robert “Robbie” Springfield, adding a major personal milestone to the remarkable journey of one of America’s leading track and field stars.

Russell shared the news with her followers, revealing that Springfield had proposed and that she had accepted. Reflecting on their relationship, the Olympic champion described him as her best friend and expressed her excitement about spending the rest of her life with him.

The couple’s relationship dates back to their college years at the University of Kentucky, where both were student-athletes and competed in track and field. Russell established herself as a standout hurdler, while Springfield competed in the long jump, giving them a shared understanding of the demands, sacrifices and pressures that come with pursuing success in athletics.

Springfield has since transitioned from competition into coaching. A former collegiate long jumper, he is now part of the coaching staff at Morehead State University, where he works with the programme’s sprinters and jumpers.

Their relationship has developed alongside Russell’s rise to the top of the sport. The defining moment of her career came at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games, where she captured gold in the women’s 100m hurdles, securing her place among the sport’s Olympic champions.

Away from competition, Springfield has remained a familiar part of Russell’s journey, sharing in the demanding periods of training and competition that accompanied her pursuit of Olympic success. Their connection has consequently grown from a college athletics relationship into a long-term partnership.

The engagement now marks another significant chapter for Russell, this time away from the track. After reaching the pinnacle of her sporting career in Paris, the 100m hurdles champion is beginning a new phase of her personal life alongside a partner who has been part of her journey since their university days.

From competing on the same collegiate stage to building a future together, Russell and Springfield’s story has evolved alongside two careers shaped by track and field. The Olympic champion will now balance this new personal chapter with her continuing ambitions in athletics

The women’s race at the 2026 TCS Amsterdam Marathon is shaping up to be one of the most competitive editions in recent years, with a deep international field set to take on the fast Dutch course on Sunday, October 18.

At the centre of the contest will be four Ethiopian athletes who have already broken the 2:20 barrier, creating the prospect of a fascinating battle for victory and a possible assault on the course record of 2:16:52.

Defending champion Aynalem Desta will return to Amsterdam looking to retain her title after producing the biggest performance of her career at last year’s 50th edition. Desta won in a personal best of 2:17:37, establishing herself among the leading marathoners in the field and setting the benchmark for this year’s contenders.

Standing in her way will be fellow Ethiopian Meseret Belete Tola, a former Amsterdam champion who knows exactly what it takes to succeed on the course. Belete Tola captured the 2023 edition in 2:18:21, and her return adds another layer of experience and proven quality to an already formidable lineup.

The field also includes Mestawut Fikir Truneh, who arrives with an impressive marathon pedigree. Truneh finished runner-up at the 2024 Berlin Marathon in 2:18:48, demonstrating her ability to compete at the highest level on one of the world's major marathon stages.

Completing the quartet of sub-2:20 Ethiopians is Buze Diriba, whose personal best of 2:19:34 places her firmly among the leading contenders. With four athletes possessing credentials below 2:20, the race is likely to develop into a tightly contested battle from the opening kilometres.

The depth extends well beyond the leading quartet. Desi Jisa Mokonin, representing Bahrain, Yeshi Kalayu Chekole of Ethiopia and Nazret Weldu Gebrehiwet of Eritrea have all established themselves as serious marathon competitors with performances approaching the 2:20 mark.

Another major name to watch is Abeba Aregawi, the former 1500m world champion representing Sweden. Aregawi has successfully transferred her talents to the marathon and made headlines earlier this year by setting a Swedish national record of 2:23:12 on her debut. Her presence adds another intriguing dimension to an already high-quality field.

Amsterdam’s marathon course has consistently provided an opportunity for elite athletes to produce fast times, and this year’s women’s lineup has the depth to turn the race into a genuine test of both championship racing and outright speed.

With four athletes already inside 2:20, two former Amsterdam champions returning to the start line and several other accomplished marathoners ready to challenge them, the battle is expected to remain open deep into the race.

The ultimate target will be the Amsterdam women’s course record of 2:16:52. Whether the leading contenders can threaten that mark remains to be seen, but the quality assembled for October 18 ensures that the record will be firmly in the spotlight when the race reaches its spectacular finish inside the Olympic Stadium.

The 2026 Valencia Half Marathon is shaping up to be a thrilling contest of speed, endurance and tactical brilliance, with some of the world’s finest road runners set to converge in Spain on October 25.

Kenya’s Daniel Ebenyo and Alex Matata will be among the leading contenders, facing a formidable Ethiopian challenge spearheaded by Jemal Yimer and Tadese Worku. The field also features Rodrigue Kwizera, who boasts the fastest personal best among the leading entrants at 58:16.

Ebenyo arrives with a personal best of 59:04, placing him firmly among the athletes capable of sustaining a demanding pace over the 21.1-kilometre distance. Matata, who owns a 59:11 best, adds further Kenyan strength, while Andrea Kiptoo brings another sub-60-minute credential to the race.

Yimer has already established himself as one of the fastest athletes in the field with a 58:33 personal best, while Worku has clocked 58:35. Kenya’s Owen Korir, with a best of 58:58, further underlines the remarkable depth of the men's lineup.

Valencia Half Marathon 2026 Entries

1. Rodrigue Kwizera (Spain) — 58:16

2. Jemal Yimer (Ethiopia) — 58:33

3. Tadese Worku (Ethiopia) — 58:35

4. Owen Korir (Kenya) — 58:58

5. Daniel Ebenyo (Kenya) — 59:04

6. Alex Matata (Kenya) — 59:11

7. Andrea Kiptoo (Kenya) — 59:11

8. Thierry Ndikumwenayo (Spain) — 59:42

9. Said Mechaal (Spain) — 1:00:24

10. Adel Mechaal (Spain) — 1:02:30

Kwizera, who finished second in Valencia last year, leads the field on paper and will be seeking another standout performance on the famously fast Valencia course. With several athletes carrying sub-60-minute credentials, the race has the ingredients for an aggressive battle from the opening kilometres.

Beyond the headline names, the men’s field is deep and highly competitive, bringing together a strong collection of experienced international athletes with proven ability over the half-marathon distance. With so much quality packed into the lineup, the race promises an intriguing battle in which tactics, endurance, positioning and finishing speed could all play a crucial role in determining the eventual champion.

Yet personal bests will count for little once the gun goes off. The title could ultimately be decided by patience, positioning and the ability to respond when the pace begins to rise in the closing stages. Every surge, every tactical move and every second saved could prove decisive on the road to the finish.

With Kenya, Ethiopia and Spain represented by athletes of exceptional quality, Valencia promises a high-octane men's showdown in which the leaders are likely to be separated by only a handful of seconds. The final kilometres could provide the defining moments of a race packed with speed, ambition and anticipation.

On October 25, the question will be simple: who has the strength to command the streets of Valencia and claim the coveted half-marathon crown?

 

April 19, 1982. The Boston Marathon unfolded under unusually warm, sunny conditions, and by the closing stages, the race had become a private battle between two very different American runners: Alberto Salazar, already one of the biggest names in distance running, and Dick Beardsley, the Minnesota runner who had emerged as a serious marathon contender.

For roughly nine miles, from the Newton Hills toward the finish, Beardsley did much of the leading, with Salazar tucked close behind. Neither man could shake the other. They ran deep into Boston locked together, trading surges and refusing to surrender an inch as the crowds along the course grew louder.

Salazar finally made his decisive move with less than a mile remaining. He opened a small gap, but Beardsley refused to disappear. The Minnesota runner chased him through the final streets, closing again as they approached the finish.

Then came the final sprint.

Salazar held his form and reached the finish first in 2:08:52, with Beardsley only two seconds behind in 2:08:54. It was an extraordinary result: both men broke 2:09 in the same Boston Marathon, and both shattered the previous course record.

The race became known as the “Duel in the Sun,” and it remains one of the most celebrated head-to-head battles in Boston Marathon history. Beardsley had not won, but his performance established him as one of America's elite marathoners.

For Salazar, however, victory came at an enormous physical cost. Immediately after crossing the finish line, he collapsed and required emergency treatment, including several litres of intravenous saline. The combination of heat, dehydration and an all-out effort had pushed his body to the limit.

Salazar's marathon career would never again produce quite the same kind of performance. His celebrated 1981 New York City Marathon victory had produced what was initially considered a world record, although the course was later found to be short. His Boston triumph therefore became one of the defining victories of his career.

Beardsley's story would take an even more difficult turn. Injuries disrupted his career, and after returning to the highest level, he suffered a devastating farm accident in 1989. Further accidents, surgeries and severe physical pain followed, eventually leading to a long battle with painkiller addiction.

He eventually overcame that struggle and transformed the darkest chapters of his life into a story of recovery, resilience and redemption.

That is what makes the 1982 Boston Marathon more than a two-second victory.

For one extraordinary afternoon, Salazar and Beardsley produced a marathon duel in which neither man was willing to give way. One crossed the finish line first. The other finished only two seconds behind him.

Two seconds separated them at Boston. Decades later, their legendary duel remains one of the greatest chapters in marathon history.