Running News Daily

American sprint standout Sam Blaskowski is taking steps toward an international future with Poland after uncovering a powerful connection to his family's ancestral homeland.

The 23-year-old sprinter, who has established himself as one of the fastest Americans of his generation with a personal best of 9.89 seconds in the 100 metres, has begun the process of obtaining Polish citizenship with the aim of eventually representing Poland in international competition.

Blaskowski's connection to the country traces back through his great-grandparents, Franciszek and Julian Błaszkowski, who emigrated from Poland to the United States in 1905. Their journey more than a century ago has now opened an unexpected new chapter for their descendant, whose athletic ambitions could soon carry the Błaszkowski name back onto the international stage under Polish colours.

The sprinter has already received support from the Polish Athletics Association as he works through the citizenship and eligibility process. Should his transfer of allegiance be completed, Blaskowski could become a significant addition to Poland's sprint programme.

His credentials certainly make the prospect an exciting one. In addition to his sub-10-second speed over 100 metres, Blaskowski owns a personal best of 19.93 seconds in the 200 metres, demonstrating the kind of versatility that could prove valuable both individually and in Poland's 4x100m relay squad.

For Blaskowski, however, the move is about more than simply changing national colours. It represents an opportunity to reconnect with his family's heritage while pursuing his ambitions at the highest level of the sport.

With his sights set on becoming part of Poland's international sprint team and competing for relay medals, Blaskowski's journey from discovering his Polish roots to potentially representing the country of his ancestors could become one of the most fascinating allegiance stories in world athletics.

A century after Franciszek and Julian Błaszkowski left Poland for America, their family's story may now be coming full circle—this time at full sprint.

Ethiopia’s Fotyеn Tesfay Haylu delivered one of the most remarkable women’s half-marathon performances ever seen on American soil on Sunday, powering to a commanding victory at the 2026 Buenos Aires Half Marathon in Argentina in 1:03:57.

Running with exceptional confidence and strength, Tesfay took control of the race and produced a superb solo performance to rewrite the event record. Her breathtaking run also carried historic significance, as she became the first woman to break the 64-minute barrier for the half marathon in the Americas, producing what is being celebrated as the fastest women’s half-marathon performance ever recorded on the continent.

The Ethiopian star was in a class of her own, crossing the finish line more than a minute clear of Turkey’s Nevin Can, who finished second in 1:05:06. Another Turkish athlete, Selin Can, completed the podium in third place with 1:05:11, as the leading trio all produced strong performances on the fast streets of Buenos Aires.

Kenya also featured prominently in the top positions, with Irene Jepchumba Kimais taking fourth in 1:06:04, followed by Sheila Chepkirui in fifth with 1:06:13. Magaret Akidor Ngathike finished sixth in 1:06:46, while fellow Kenyan Deborah Samum claimed seventh place in 1:08:32.

Brazil’s Nubia de Oliveira Silva was eighth in 1:11:13, while Argentina’s Sofia Luna and Dahyana Juarez rounded out the top 10 with times of 1:11:21 and 1:11:28, respectively.

Top 10 Women – 2026 Buenos Aires Half Marathon

1. Fotyеn Tesfay Haylu (Ethiopia) – 1:03:57

2. Nevin Can (Turkey) – 1:05:06

3. Selin Can (Turkey) – 1:05:11

4. Irene Jepchumba Kimais (Kenya) – 1:06:04

5. Sheila Chepkirui (Kenya) – 1:06:13

6. Magaret Akidor Ngathike (Kenya) – 1:06:46

7. Deborah Samum (Kenya) – 1:08:32

8. Nubia de Oliveira Silva (Brazil) – 1:11:13

9. Sofia Luna (Argentina) – 1:11:21

10. Dahyana Juarez (Argentina) – 1:11:28

For Tesfay, it was far more than a race victory. Her 1:03:57 performance was a statement of extraordinary quality, combining speed, endurance and remarkable solo running to produce a landmark result in Buenos Aires. In a race that will be remembered for years to come, the Ethiopian did not simply win—she redefined what was thought possible for women’s half-marathon running in the Americas.

Ethiopia’s Yomif Kejelcha produced one of the most extraordinary performances in road racing history on the streets of Buenos Aires, Argentina, reclaiming the half marathon world record with a sensational 56:51 performance at the 2026 Buenos Aires Half Marathon.

The former world record-holder delivered a breathtaking exhibition of speed and endurance to take 29 seconds off the previous pending mark of 57:20, set by Uganda’s Jacob Kiplimo and takes a huge chunk from his own former official world record. Kejelcha's new performance is pending the standard ratification procedures, but if officially ratified, it will return the world record to the Ethiopian star and mark another remarkable chapter in the evolution of the event. 

Kejelcha's achievement is particularly significant because the 57-minute barrier had already been broken before. Jacob Kiplimo had previously run under 57 minutes, clocking 56:42 that was not ratified demonstrating that the once-unthinkable barrier was possible. Kejelcha, however, has become the second man to run under 57-minute barrier who now returns to the top of the all-time rankings with another historic performance in Buenos Aires.

The Ethiopian's race was remarkable not only for the final time but also for the way he built his performance. He covered the opening five kilometres in 13:44 before reaching 10km in 27:18. Rather than slowing, Kejelcha accelerated through the middle stages, passing 15km in 40:39 and 20km in 54:02 as he continued to push the limits of elite road racing.

By the time he reached the finish line, Kejelcha had completed the race at an extraordinary average pace of approximately 2:42 per kilometre, producing one of the most astonishing sustained efforts ever witnessed in distance running. His stunning run sent a powerful message to the athletics world and further strengthened his status as one of the most formidable distance runners of his generation.

Behind the record-breaking champion, Ethiopia completed a dominant clean sweep of the men's podium. Tadese Worku Gebresilase claimed second place in 59:18, while Bereket Nega Batebo secured third in 1:00:17, giving Ethiopia a memorable one-two-three finish in the Argentine capital.

Kenya’s Jonathan Kipkoech Kamosong finished fourth in 1:00:20, followed by compatriot Simon Maywa in fifth with 1:00:55. Argentina’s Ignacio Erario gave the home supporters plenty to celebrate with an impressive sixth-place finish in 1:00:57, breaking the one-hour barrier in front of an enthusiastic local crowd.

Dillon Kipyeko of Kenya finished seventh in 1:01:07, with Robert Kiprop Koech eighth in 1:02:01. Mexico’s Julio Ortiz Ponce took ninth place in 1:03:17, while Colombia’s Jimmy Gómez completed the top 10 in 1:03:34.

The Buenos Aires Half Marathon will now take its place in the history books as the scene of a truly extraordinary breakthrough. For Kejelcha, this was more than just another victory. It was a spectacular return to the top, reclaiming a world record he had previously held and once again rewriting the limits of the half marathon.

The 56:51 performance remains pending ratification, but Yomif Kejelcha's run has already delivered one of the defining moments in the history of road racing.

Kenya delivered another commanding display of distance-running excellence at the Antrim Coast Half Marathon, with Isaia Lasoi leading a memorable Kenyan clean sweep of the men's podium in a race packed with world-class performances.

Lasoi emerged victorious after a thrilling battle at the front, crossing the finish line in a superb 58:26 setting a new course record. His winning performance underlined his strength and speed over the half-marathon distance, but he was made to work all the way by fellow Kenyan Daniel Mateiko, who finished just three seconds behind in 58:29 after an electrifying duel for the title.

The contest between the two leaders produced one of the standout moments of the race, with both athletes pushing deep into elite territory as they fought for victory. In the end, Lasoi found just enough to secure the win, while Mateiko's narrow defeat highlighted the remarkable depth and quality of Kenya's leading distance runners.

Vincent Kipkorir completed the Kenyan sweep, taking third place in 1:00:38 to ensure that all three places on the podium belonged to Kenyan athletes. Samwel Chebolei added further Kenyan strength to the results, finishing fourth in 1:01:01, while Amos Langat was also among the leading finishers.

The international field featured several prominent names. Australia's Jimmy Whelan produced a strong run, while Ethiopia's Yismaw Dillu featured among the front group. American marathon star Galen Rupp also delivered a notable performance, clocking 1:01:29 in another competitive outing for the experienced distance runner. Former world-class track and road athlete Edward Cheserek was also among the top finishers.

Lasoi's 58:26 victory, however, was the defining performance of the day. Together with Mateiko and Kipkorir, he gave Kenya a perfect podium and another emphatic reminder of the country's extraordinary strength in elite road running.

The Antrim Coast Half Marathon once again provided a fast, competitive stage for some of the world's finest distance runners, but when the decisive moments arrived, it was Kenya that owned the podium.

One of the most iconic milestones in the history of ultramarathon running is drawing closer, with entries for the historic 100th edition of the Comrades Marathon set to open on Tuesday, 25 August 2026.

The Comrades Marathon Association has officially announced a detailed entry process for the 2027 race, which will unfold in three stages and give runners around the world the opportunity to secure their place in what promises to be one of the most significant editions ever held of The Ultimate Human Race.

The announcement followed the official launch of the 2027 Comrades Marathon on Wednesday, 19 August, when the centenary campaign, “The Greatest Story Ever Run,” was unveiled alongside a special logo created exclusively for the landmark 100th edition.

The launch also revealed several major highlights for the Centenary Race. The historic event will take place on Sunday, 13 June 2027, and will be a Down Run, with 28,000 places available. The entry process will include a ballot, while the race will offer a record R8.919 million in prize money. Organisers have also set an ambitious goal of raising R10 million for the Amabeadibeadi charities, adding an important charitable dimension to the centenary celebrations. One of the defining moments of the launch was the unveiling of the special Centenary mark, created to commemorate this extraordinary milestone in the history of the race.

The entry process begins on 25 August at 10:00 a.m. SAST, when entries open for Green Number runners, Yellow Number runners and Amabeadibeadi charity entrants.

The next phase follows on 2 September at 10:00 a.m. SAST, when entries open for Comrades Marathon Association members. This window will remain open for 72 hours or until the available entry allocation is filled, with places offered on a strictly first-come, first-served basis.

For general entrants, the process will move to a ballot system. General entries open on 9 September at 10:00 a.m. SAST, with runners able to enter the ballot until it closes on 22 September at 4:30 p.m. SAST. The ballot draw is then scheduled to take place on 23 September.

Several other crucial dates will shape the road to the historic race. The substitution period will run from 15 to 31 March 2027, while 3 May 2027 is the final deadline for runners to submit their qualifying performances, seeding information and other required entry details.

To qualify for the 2027 Comrades Marathon, runners must complete a 42.2km marathon in under five hours between 15 June 2026 and 3 May 2027.

The journey will finally culminate on Sunday, 13 June 2027, when thousands of runners are expected to line up for the historic 100th edition of the Comrades Marathon.

The 2027 race will represent a remarkable moment for the legendary South African ultramarathon. For more than a century, the Comrades Marathon has captured the imagination of runners and spectators with its extraordinary test of endurance, determination and human spirit. Its centenary edition will celebrate the generations of athletes who have faced its demanding roads, conquered its challenges and helped build one of the world's most respected endurance events.

For runners dreaming of becoming part of this historic occasion, the road to Comrades 2027 is now clearly marked. From the opening of entries in August 2026 to race day in June 2027, every deadline will matter.

The Greatest Story Ever Run is preparing for its most historic chapter yet.

KATA founder Bob Anderson says coach Charles Ngeno received KSh1.077 million in repayable, interest-free financing for two running camps and six acres of potatoes, repeatedly discussed repayment and later sought additional funding.

A programme in which Bob and Catherine Anderson say they committed more than KSh42 million to support Kenyan runners is now at the centre of a dispute over money advanced to coach Charles Ng’eno.

Anderson, founder of My Best Runs, the Kenyan Athletics Training Academy and Runners World, says Ng’eno received KSh1,077,500 in interest free loans to establish two KATA running camps and cultivate six acres of potatoes.

Anderson says none of the money has been repaid.

Ng’eno should be given a full opportunity to respond to the allegations and provide his own financial records, contracts, harvest records and explanation of the transactions before publication.

Anderson founded Runner’s World as a teenager and says his motivation for developing KATA came from decades spent in athletics and from seeing the conditions faced by some aspiring Kenyan runners.

“This was never simply a potato farming project,” Anderson said. “The purpose was to establish camps where talented athletes could receive accommodation, food and world-class training. Every shilling provided to establish the camps and grow the potatoes was an interest-free loan that had to be repaid.”

Two loans supporting one objective

According to Anderson, the KATA model combined two forms of repayable financing.

Camp operators could receive interest-free startup loans to cover expenses including rent, beds, mattresses, furniture and initial food supplies. Depending on the camp's requirements, Anderson says this financing could reach KSh500,000.

Separate interest-free loans were used to finance potato production, generally budgeted at approximately KSh100,000 per acre.

The intention was for proceeds from potato sales to repay both the farming costs and the money advanced to establish the running camp.

The funds were therefore not intended to operate as grants that beneficiaries could retain without repayment.

After the loans were cleared, the remaining income was intended to support athletes and help finance subsequent farming seasons.

Anderson says the model was designed to create a revolving system in which money recovered from one camp could eventually help another.

“The idea was to provide the seed capital once and then have the potato proceeds repay everything,” Anderson said. “After the camp and farming loans were cleared, each camp could continue operating without depending upon Catherine and me for more money.”

The financial projections used by KATA were based on anticipated agricultural returns. Anderson says the programme estimated that a well-managed acre could generate about KSh400,000 in gross sales, although actual returns would depend on yields, disease, weather and market prices.

These were projections rather than guaranteed returns.

More than KSh42 million committed

Anderson says he and Catherine committed more than KSh42 million to establishing and operating the wider programme.

Approximately KSh36 million, he says, was provided through interest-free loans to coaches, farmers and camp operators, while more than KSh6 million was spent on independent contractors and related programme expenses.

The Kenyan personnel engaged to coordinate activities and monitor participating farms were independent contractors, according to Anderson, rather than employees.

The Andersons did not establish a company in Kenya, with the programme directed through their California-based business.

The complete financial records covering the wider KATA programme have not been independently reviewed for this article.

The KSh1,077,500 advanced to Charles Ngeno represents only one part of the wider programme.

But Anderson says the failure to recover the money meant funds intended to circulate to other camps and athletes became unavailable.

Athletics Kenya references

Anderson says Ng’eno regularly communicated with him about athletics, farming and the proposed camps.

Among the material provided are photographs appearing to show Ng’eno participating in Athletics Kenya-related meetings, including one in which he is seated behind an Athletics Kenya nameplate and another in which he appears to address a gathering.

Ng’eno also told Anderson that he had discussed KATA with senior Athletics Kenya officials.

According to Anderson, Ng’eno reported that the Athletics Kenya president had praised the programme and believed it could benefit Kenyan athletes.

Those claims have not been independently confirmed.

The photographs show Ng’eno at athletics-related functions but do not establish that Athletics Kenya endorsed KATA or participated in the financing arrangement.

“It gave me confidence,” Anderson said. “Charles presented himself as a senior and respected figure in Kenyan athletics. He talked about discussions with the AK president, and I believed he had the standing to make the camps successful.”

Athletics Kenya has not been accused of receiving any of the disputed money.

KSh1.07 million and requests for more

According to Anderson, the KSh1,077,500 advanced to Ng’eno was intended to cover work toward two camps and six acres of potatoes.

In August 2025, Ng’eno sent what he described as bookkeeping for the Olenguruone and Nakuru camps. The figures referred to a proposed total allocation of KSh1.3 million, including potato projects, rent, bunk beds, mattresses, blankets and food.

The KSh1.3 million was a proposed budget and was not the amount Anderson says Ng’eno ultimately received.

Anderson says he stopped advancing money after repayment dates were missed and other concerns emerged.

“I probably would have sent more because Charles kept presenting new plans,” Anderson said. “Fortunately, one red flag after another was raised, and I cut him off after KSh1,077,500.”

Anderson says Ng’eno later sought approximately KSh600,000 to cultivate another six acres.

Had that request been approved, Anderson's total exposure to Ng’eno could have approached KSh1.7 million.

Ng’eno's own messages about the harvest

WhatsApp correspondence provided by Anderson contains messages attributed to Ng’eno discussing the farming operation and anticipated returns.

In an October 7, 2025 message, Ng’eno said he expected his first harvest to produce more than 150 bags of 50kg potatoes.

“For my first harvest, I'm expecting to have more than 150 bags of 50kg,” he wrote.

In the same exchange, Ng’eno referred to the “agreed loan” and said he was aware of the remaining obligation.

He also promised a “good return” and asked Anderson to proceed with what he described as a final disbursement.

“Please let us make an agreement that this be final dispersal until you experience the delivery of revenue,” he wrote.

In November, the correspondence moved to the practical issue of harvesting and selling the potatoes.

On November 11, Ng’eno told Anderson that some of his other acres were ready for harvesting but said market prices were poor.

“My other acres are ready for harvesting but this is not the time to do so. price is terrible,” he wrote.

He said the crop required spraying against worms and requested KSh15,000.

The following day, Ng’eno referred to potatoes from two acres that he expected to harvest within two weeks.

“Bob. Please send me 15k for Olenguruone camp. Potatoes to be harvested in 2 weeks. 2 acres,” he wrote.

Anderson subsequently asked for information about the number of bags, total weight, and photographs showing where the potatoes were being stored.

Ng’eno said he had secured free storage space and added that his farm manager was working on the ground.

The exchanges establish that the two sides were discussing the loan, potato farming, anticipated harvests and additional funding. They do not by themselves establish the final size of the harvest, sales proceeds or repayment.

Repeated repayment promises

Other correspondence reviewed for this story contains further discussions about repayment.

In November 2025, Anderson says Ng’eno indicated that nearly KSh600,000 would be paid before the end of December, with another KSh200,000 expected in January or February after seeds were sold.

Ng’eno also referred to a plot allegedly worth KSh1.5 million that could be disposed of if necessary to clear the loan.

“Don’t worry about me,” he wrote.

On January 31, 2026, after Anderson asked how much Ng’eno would begin repaying, Ng’eno responded:

“Yes, Bob, I need to start with Ksh. 400,000.”

He added that he was responsible and “must make payments.”

Anderson says the KSh400,000 payment was not made.

Ng’eno also told Anderson that repayment had been delayed because he was constructing a residential building that would become a KATA camp. He offered to show Anderson the building through a video call.

The correspondence shows that repayment was repeatedly discussed. It does not, without the underlying bank records, establish precisely how much money was ultimately generated from the farms or how the funds advanced were used.

A programme built around trust

For Anderson, the dispute goes beyond one borrower.

He says the KATA programme was created after he and Catherine saw the challenges facing some Kenyan athletes and wanted to provide better accommodation, food and training environments.

The agricultural component was intended to give camps an independent source of income.

But Anderson says the experience with Ng’eno and other beneficiaries ultimately forced the programme to stop advancing money.

“This was not simply a case of Charles misleading Catherine and me,” Anderson said. “Fellow Kenyans working with us in good faith also relied on the information and promises he provided.”

Those contractors have not been publicly identified.

Anderson has made broader claims about repayment problems involving other beneficiaries. Those claims require separate verification and should not be treated as established facts without supporting records and responses from those involved.

The questions requiring answers

The Ng’eno case leaves several questions that can be answered only through the underlying records.

How was the KSh1,077,500 used?

How much went into each camp?

Were all six acres planted?

What was harvested?

How much was sold?

Who bought the potatoes?

How much revenue was generated?

Were any proceeds used to repay the loan?

Did the two proposed camps operate, and how many athletes did they support?

Why were the promised repayments not made?

And does the reported KSh1.5 million property exist and was it available to secure or repay the debt?

Ng’eno should also be given an opportunity to respond to the claims concerning his representations about Athletics Kenya and to provide evidence of any discussions with its officials.

For Anderson, the principle behind the programme remains straightforward.

“This money was not donated to Charles,” he said. “It was loaned to establish camps and grow crops. It had to come back so it could help other athletes and camps.”

The dispute is now about whether the funds were used according to the agreements, what income the projects generated and why Anderson says none of the money has been returned.

Until complete financial records, contractual documents and Ng’eno's response are obtained, the allegations should remain clearly identified as contested claims rather than established findings.