Running News Daily

How Much Have Tracks and Shoes Improved 10,000m Times? A Look at Billy Mills’ 1964 Olympic Gold Compared to Today

When Billy Mills won the 10,000 meters at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, he shocked the world. A relative unknown at the international level, Mills surged past world record holder Ron Clarke in the final stretch to win gold in 28:24.4, setting an Olympic record. It remains one of the most famous upsets in Olympic history.

At the 2024 Paris Olympics, Billy Mills sat in the stands, watching intently as the men's 10,000-meter final unfolded. Sixty years after his historic victory in Tokyo, he witnessed another American, Grant Fisher, battling for the podium.

With two laps to go, Fisher was perfectly positioned, matching strides with the East African elites, his long, efficient stride reminiscent of Mills' own finishing kick in 1964. 

As the bell rang for the final lap, Fisher surged, momentarily moving into second. Mills, now 86, leaned forward, sensing history. But in the last 100 meters, Fisher was edged out, securing bronze. Mills smiled, knowing how close greatness had come again. Fisher clocked 26:43.46, just one third of a second behind the gold medal winner. 

Mills had ran his time on a cinder track, wearing "basic running shoes"—conditions that would be considered primitive compared to today’s high-tech track surfaces and carbon-plated racing shoes. Given all the advancements in running technology, how much faster could Billy Mills have run on a modern track with today’s footwear? And how much have these innovations contributed to the faster times we see today?

The Difference Between Cinder and Synthetic Tracks

One of the biggest changes in distance running over the last six decades has been the transition from cinder tracks to synthetic surfaces. Cinder tracks, composed of crushed brick, coal, or ash, provided uneven footing, absorbed energy from each step, and became soft and unpredictable when wet. Athletes often wore spikes with long, heavy pins to grip the loose surface.

By contrast, modern synthetic tracks, introduced in the late 1960s, offer a firm, springy surface that returns more energy to the runner with each stride. Research suggests that switching from a cinder track to a synthetic track can improve distance-running performance by about 1-2 percent.

For a 10,000-meter race, a 1-2 percent time reduction equates to about 17 to 34 seconds. This means that if Billy Mills had run his race on a modern track, his time could have been anywhere between 27:50 and 28:07 just from the track surface alone.

The Impact of Modern Running Shoes

The second major advancement in distance running has been the development of carbon-plated racing shoes with high-energy-return foams. The latest models, introduced after 2016, are designed to reduce energy loss with each step, making it easier for runners to maintain their pace over long distances. Studies suggest these shoes provide 2-4 percent energy savings, which translates to a 30-60 second improvement over 10,000 meters.

Adding this to the estimated track advantage, Mills’ performance could have been further improved, bringing his potential time down to around 26:50 to 27:30.

Comparing Billy Mills’ Performance to Modern Champions

The current Olympic record for the 10,000 meters was set by Uganda’s Joshua Cheptegei at the 2024 Paris Olympics with a time of 26:43.14. That’s 1 minute and 41 seconds faster than Mills' winning time.

However, when we factor in advancements in track surfaces and footwear, the estimated modern equivalent of Mills’ race suggests he could have run within a minute of today’s best, making him far more competitive by modern standards than his official time suggests.

Other Factors That Have Led to Faster 10,000m Times

While tracks and shoes play a significant role in faster performances, several other factors have contributed to the improvement in 10,000-meter times over the decades:

More specialized training. Today’s distance runners have more scientifically tailored training programs, including altitude training, precise recovery strategies, and improved strength training techniques.

Better pacing and race strategy. Modern races are often assisted by pacemakers who set a steady, fast pace, helping runners conserve energy and stay consistent. In contrast, Mills’ race was a classic tactical battle with surges and slow-downs.

Nutritional and recovery advances. Today’s runners have access to optimized hydration, fueling, and recovery methods that allow them to train harder and more efficiently.

Billy Mills’ Performance in Context

Billy Mills’ gold medal run remains one of the most inspiring performances in Olympic history, not just because of the time he ran, but because of the way he won. His dramatic sprint finish against heavily favored competitors on a slower, less predictable surface showcased his incredible talent, toughness, and racing instincts.

Had he raced under today’s conditions with modern advantages, Mills likely would have been among the best in the world by today’s standards. His story is a reminder that while technology has helped athletes run faster, the heart and determination behind great performances remain unchanged.

The next time you watch an Olympic 10,000-meter race, consider just how much conditions have changed since 1964—and how incredible it was for Billy Mills to win on that cinder track with the tools available at the time. His legacy stands as a testament to the pure competitive spirit of running.

(02/12/2025) Views: 613 ⚡AMP
by Boris Baron