Running News Daily

After a year of testing, we've identified 12 marathon shoes that will boost your performance and make the race more enjoyable

While training undeniably has the biggest impact on your marathon performance, there’s one more thing you can do to ensure you’re ready to give your best on race day: invest in a pair of marathon racing shoes.

An effective marathon racing shoe can help reduce the repeated impact that miles after miles put on your legs while allowing you to get more energy out of each footstrike. Even more importantly, the right marathon racing shoe will provide you with a platform that is stable and cushioned enough to carry you through 26.2 miles in security and comfort. We’ve spent the last year rigorously testing every option on the market to help you easily pick the perfect pair for you.

Seven years after the debut of the first super shoe, the thick-stacked, carbon-plated racers are ubiquitous at the front of every marathon and increasingly common among runners in the pack looking to optimize their performance. These shoes have been lab-proven to improve running economy by a few percentage points, making it easier to maintain a faster pace. Runners also report that, when running in a super shoe that complements their stride, they experience less muscular fatigue as well.

These are some of the super shoes that our testers found most comfortable and effective at marathon pace, but your experience may vary (as we found when we had three testers compare 16 super shoes. Every super shoe boasts some sort of ultralight, hyper-responsive foam with an embedded, curved carbon-fiber plate—but each delivers a surprisingly unique ride. You’ll have to experiment to find one that gives you wings.

See our “How to Choose Marathon Shoes” section at the bottom of this article for more guidance on whether you should consider a super shoe and how to select a pair that works for your stride.

Designed specifically for marathons, the Alphafly set a new standard as the fastest marathon shoe ever when Eliud Kipchoge wore them while breaking the 2-hour barrier in a staged marathon, clocking 1:59:40.2 in October 2019.

Now, in its third iteration, the Alphafly 3 continues to dominate as the ultimate marathon racing shoe. Designed with Nike’s Air Zoom Units in the forefoot and a PEBA-based midsole, our more competitive, efficient testers praised the Alphafly 3 for its bouncy, energy-efficient ride.

Subtle adjustments to the shoe’s geometry, including a wider footprint and carbon fiber plate, paired with repositioned Air Zoom Units and strategically sculpted midsole, give the Alphafly 3 a distinctly different feel from its predecessor. These changes effectively address some of the issues found in the Alphafly 2, which many felt was heavy and clunky compared to the original.

The new Alphafly 3 is surprisingly nimble, weighing in as the lightest Alphafly to date. Even running as fast as 5k pace, I found the Alphafly responded quickly, encouraging a fast turnover. That said, it may be too sharp of a tool for some runners, as those who require a stable stance may find it a bit wobbly, especially in the heel.

The redesigned Atomkit 3.0 upper is about as race-y as you can get—extremely light and airy. Though a bit tough to put on because of its tightly woven mesh (like previous models), the new upper is highly breathable and secure, with sawtooth laces that stay tied tight throughout the marathon. You can read our full Alphafly 3 review and how it compared to other racers in our .

A stark contrast to On’s previous carbon fiber racing shoe, the firm-feeling Cloudboom Echo, the Cloudboom Strike is soft, bouncy, and fun to run in. Runners who can maintain their balance on what is a fairly unstable platform are rewarded with a lively, highly cushioned ride that’s comfortable and responsive, making it ideal for long-distance efforts.

The secret to the Strike’s sweet ride lies with the insole. On swapped out the traditional Strobel (a thin layer connecting the upper to the sole) and sockliner for a thick, removable layer of high-energy PEBA foam, thus increasing the amount of performance-enhancing foam underfoot. The result is a legal racer with cushioning that feels like it exceeds the World Athletics’ maximum stack height.

The smooth, ultra-cushioned ride is surprisingly quick for such a thick shoe, responding nimbly even when exceeding 5k pace. The shoe accommodated both long-striding testers and those who prefer to turn over faster.

The Cloudboom Strike fit runs long enough that you might consider sizing down by half a size. However, the one-piece mesh upper, which breathes well and effectively repels moisture, easily cinches down for a secure foot hold. You can read our full Cloudboom Strike review.

The Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris gives runners the best of both worlds—a highly energetic, cushioned feel and a stable ride. Super shoes’s tall, thick midsoles often create a wobbly sensation, forcing your stabilizing muscles to work harder to maintain balance.

The key to the Metaspeed Sky Paris’s stability is its wide base under the forefoot, coupled with an updated, wider carbon fiber plate. This makes the Metaspeed Sky Paris an excellent choice for beginner, intermediate, or unstable runners who want to enjoy the benefits of super shoe technology while still having a supportive, predictable platform. One back-of-the-pack tester noted that the broad base provided a “smooth ride, and the running dynamics worked extremely well with my foot and my own personal gait.”

The shoe’s stability, however, doesn’t compromise its stride-lengthening performance for experienced, efficient marathoners. Testers found that the Metaspeed Sky had the ability to work well for a wide range of runners and paces.

The shoe also has a new, more pliable and comfortable mesh upper and midsole foam that’s approximately 8 percent lighter and, Asics says, has an 8.2 percent better energy return over the previous model. The best part: The shoe got nearly an ounce lighter, making it one of the lightest marathon-racing options. You can read more about the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris in our .

The groundbreaking adidas Adizero Adios Pro Evo 1 shatters the mold as the lightest super shoe ever made, weighing nearly 2 ounces less than the next lightest super shoe. Yet from the outset, I was amazed that a shoe this light could have this much cushioning.

The Pro Evo 1’s rocker is long and aggressive, curving up to a high toe spring (elevation of the toe box). Initially, at well-below marathon speeds, it felt forced and unnatural. However, once I picked it up to around marathon pace and my toes engaged with the steep curve, I sensed a smooth rolling action that energetically pushed me forward. I believe marathoners averaging seven-minute miles or faster will see the most benefit from these.

Besides being the lightest super shoe on the market, the Evo 1 also claims the title of the most expensive. That, coupled with initial talk of the shoe only working for a single marathon, makes the Evo 1 a big investment. Our test pair, however, lasted nearly 200 miles before the midsole showed signs of wear. While not every runner can expect similar durability, those with an efficient stride should enjoy everything the Evo 1 has to offer much longer than a single marathon. You can read our full review and durability test.

The challenge with super-soft, highly responsive cushioning in super shoes is that they often lack stability, demanding an efficient stride to maintain control as they first squish, then bounce back strongly, magnifying forces—whether propulsive or unbalanced. For runners seeking a more stable carbon fiber shoe without losing the performance benefits, the Brooks Hyperion Elite 4 offers a firmer underfoot feel than most.

Instead of the heavily cushioned sink and trampoline-like bounce of many of today’s super shoes, the nitrogen-infused DNA Flash V2 midsole is extremely responsive, pushing back against the foot immediately and ready to pounce on the pace when needed. That lively firmness, combined with a curved carbon fiber plate embedded in the rockered midsole, gives the Brooks Hyperion Elite 4 a smooth, stable, and forward-propelling ride.

In terms of fit and feel, Brooks nailed the basics. The thin, breathable mesh upper perfectly embodies a racing shoe’s ideal—minimalistic, with a secure midfoot lockdown that makes you feel firmly in control.

These are not for you if you prefer a highly cushioned, springy running experience. However, if you feel bounced around by most super shoes and want a firmer-feeling shoe that offers a good mix of stability and fast-rolling performance, the Brooks Hyperion Elite 4 is the shoe you’re looking for. You can read more about the Brooks Hyperion Elite 4.

With a ride that feels like bouncing on a pogo stick, the Hoka Cielo X1 delivers unmatched spring with every stride. Designed with two layers of über-responsive PEBA foam separated by a winged carbon fiber plate and a severe, heel-to-toe rocker profile, testers marveled at how much fun these shoes were. One tester described running in them as “feeling effortless,” adding, “It almost feels like you’re cheating when you’re wearing these shoes.”

However, a few testers had mixed reactions to the shoe’s prescriptive geometry. The stiff platform and aggressive rocker design seemed most effective for a midfoot strike and within a narrow pace range, specifically around six to eight minutes per mile for our testers.

Another knock concerned the shoe’s stiff, ribbon-like shoe laces. Nearly every tester commented on how difficult it was to get a tight, dialed-in knot. Still, if you can get past the less-than-ideal lacing—or choose to swap them out entirely—and are comfortable in the pace range sweet spot, the ride is worth it and could deliver a fun, fast marathon.

Cielo X1 clocks in at a hefty 9.3 ounces for mens size 9 and for womens size 10, making it the heaviest super shoe on the market. Thanks to the high-energy foam, however, we still found it held its own in the super shoe pack when it came to performance. You can read more about the Hoka Cielo X1.

Unfortunately, there are not a ton of options when it comes to highly cushioned zero drop racing shoes. Fortunately, the only option is a really good one. Now in its second iteration, the Altra Vanish Carbon 2 features three more millimeters of softer, more flexible underfoot cushioning heel to toe. Embedded in the soft, nitrogen-infused, TPE-based midsole is a full-length carbon fiber plate that adds a bit of stabilizing and propulsive stiffness without feeling controlling.

The Vanish Carbon 2’s midsole doesn’t have as dramatic a trampoline sensation as some other marathon racing shoes, but it delivers a smooth, cushioned ride that’s hard to beat. Even as someone who typically struggles with zero-drop shoes, I found the Vanish Carbon 2 enjoyable and surprisingly easy to run in, thanks to the high stack and rockered profile. Testers said the low heel helped increase their cadence and kept them more on their toes.

Despite not having a ton of structure, the lightweight, breathable mesh upper does a surprisingly good job of securing your midfoot while your toes have room to splay in Altra’s signature wide toe box. You can read more about the Altra Vanish Carbon 2.

When it comes to replicating the performance benefits of road super shoes for the trail, shoemakers have struggled to achieve the same level of success. The adidas Terrex Speed Ultra is a standout exception. Designed with one of the most aggressive rockered profiles on a trail running shoe, the Terrex Speed Ultra feels awkward initially, almost like you’re walking downhill.

However, once you get accustomed to the unique profile that wants to push you forward, you’re rewarded with a propulsive ride unlike any other trail running shoe. Inside, the high-performance TPEE (Thermoplastic Polyester Elastomer) midsole incorporates a four-pronged, slightly flexible PEBA-based rod system, providing extra stiffness to the soft foam without creating instability on technical terrain. While it manages well on groomed or rocky sections, like most highly cushioned trail shoes, it’s not designed for prolonged precise technical maneuvering.

Staying true to its race-ready design, the upper is razor-thin and slightly padded to keep weight at a minimum. The quick-drying synthetic material, combined with a gusseted tongue and sawtooth lacing that bites like a threatened rattlesnake, provides excellent midfoot lockdown. The only drawback is the unstructured heel counter, which can cause some heel lift if the laces aren’t pulled extra tight. You can read our full review of the Adidas Agravic Terrex Speed Ultra.

Not everyone wants or needs a super shoe when covering 26.2 miles. Here are some top options without a rigid carbon-fiber plate, sorted with consideration for specific needs and preferences.

Supershoes’ tall, highly cushioned soles create an unstable and wobbly platform, especially for beginner runners who spend more time in contact with the ground than their faster counterparts. Plus their rigid, curved plates dictate how the foot rolls, and are tuned to be optimal for fast, efficient runners.

Puma’s Deviate Nitro 3 combats these issues by combining two foams, a softer one closer to the foot with a firmer one closer to the ground, separated by a semi-flexible carbon-fiber composite plate. This design offers most of the cushioning and propulsive benefits of a super shoe, without the instability or the prescriptive stride control.

What sets the Deviate Nitro 3 apart most, however, is its remarkable ability to deliver a smooth ride at any pace. There’s nothing restrictive about the shoe—it adapts to your running speed and performs effortlessly, making it double as a great everyday trainer as well as a racing shoe.

Keeping comfort in mind, the upper features an engineered knit mesh with moderately padded heel collar. Testers felt the fit was true to size with a small amount of stretch throughout the upper to accommodate foot swelling or irregularities, such as bunions. The stretchy laces received mixed reviews, as one found he needed to keep tightening them to feel secure during the run. You can read our full review of the Puma Deviate Nitro 3.

When the Saucony Tempus first came out, we were blown away by its ability to control the soft, unstable nature of a PEBA midsole without taking away its high-energy, performance-enhancing benefits. Keeping everything the same underfoot, but adding a better fitting, more breathable mesh upper, the Tempus 2 continued to wow us with its supportive, yet lively ride.

The combination of soft, bouncy PEBA foam and a firmer EVA frame that uniquely wraps over and under the high-performance core helps guide the foot into a more stable position, making it perfect for beginners, or any runner, who may struggle with foot alignment, particularly during a long and exhausting marathon. The moderate stack height of 33mm in the heel and 25mm in the forefoot strikes a perfect balance—not so thick and cushioned that you can’t push off effectively, yet not so thin that it compromises comfort. The dual foam midsole, without a plate, provides ample underfoot protection while still allowing for a good sense of ground feel and accommodates any stride pattern.

The main drawback is that it’s relatively heavy for a racing shoe (while light for a trainer). Weighing 9.4 ounces for men and 8.2 ounces for women, it’s the heaviest shoe on our list. However, if you prioritize stability and want to tap into the performance benefits of PEBA in a supportive but not prescriptive shoe, this is still the top choice on the market.

Known for its wide toe box designs, Topo has mastered the balance of offering plenty of space for your toes while ensuring a secure midfoot lockdown. One of only four shoes in this roundup without a plate in the midsole, the Topo Specter 2 delivers a more natural and flexible experience than your stiff-plated super shoe or super trainer. A generous layer of Pebax foam underfoot is tuned firmer than usual, but still delivers its signature bouncy ride. One tester described the midsole as “firm and springy with a lot of response,” adding, “the shoe feels airy and fast with the perfect balance of stiffness versus flex.”

Testers found the Specter 2 incredibly versatile. It delivers the same ease and comfort on easy run days as it does on uptempo runs or races, thanks to its highly cushioned, responsive, and adaptable sole, and low overall weight.

Where the shoe truly stands out, however, is in its fit. One tester said about Topo shoes, “They’ve gone from being one of my least favorite brands to offering some of the best-fitting shoes I’ve tested.” The wide toe box isn’t just for runners with wide feet. Even our runners with regular-width feet appreciated the extra space, once they got used to their toes having room for their natural positioning and splay.

As foams have evolved to be increasingly lighter, marathon racing shoes are getting thicker and more cushioned. Rather than allowing your foot to react to the ground and move naturally, these thick-soled shoes blunt the underfoot feel and dictate how your foot moves through the gait cycle to various degrees. While this works well for some runners, others prefer a more minimalist ride.

If you’re the kind of runner who finds today’s cushioned shoes cumbersome and as restrictive as a stiff suit of armor, look no further. The Topo Cyclone 2 is a free and flexible lightweight racer that lets your foot control the shoe, not the other way around. Testers described the ride as “nimble” and “flexible” with a “slipper-like” feel.

The Cyclone 2’s Pebax midsole delivers the soft feel and springy response of a super shoe, but the comparatively thin stack height (28mm/23mm) keeps the squish and bounce moderate, and lets you feel the ground under the cushioning. You won’t find a plate embedded in the flexible midsole; instead there’s a slight rocker profile to help smooth the transition from stance to toe-off.

We’ve always found Topo Athletic makes some of the best-fitting shoes on the market, and the Cyclone certainly follows suit. A tailored midsection with excellent lockdown gives way to a roomy anatomical toe box. You can read our full review of the Topo Cyclone 2

There are a few factors beginner runners should consider before choosing a carbon fiber shoe. First, most carbon fiber running shoes are designed with fast, efficient runners in mind. Studies have shown that slower runners get less improvement in their running economy from the shoes, and the shoes actually make running harder for a significant number.

If you have developed solid mechanics, you may benefit from a carbon fiber shoe. However, if your form is still a work in progress, the stiffness of the carbon plate and the hyper-responsiveness of the foam could actually magnify poor mechanics, reduce your performance, and increase the risk of injury.

Additionally, every carbon fiber shoe is built differently—the placement and shape of the carbon plate, geometry of the midsole and properties of the foam all are different, model to model. This means no two carbon plated shoes will run exactly the same. It’s important to match your individual gait to a carbon fiber shoe by testing several options for the one that feels the best. In general, beginners should be cautious and make sure they’re fully comfortable in carbon fiber shoes before racing in them.

Our exhaustive testing process involves evaluating every marathon racing shoe on the market, sometimes as long as over a year, with input from more than 20 experienced wear-testers. They each fill out a detailed testing questionnaire evaluating key points such as fit, comfort, cushioning, and speed. The completed questionnaires are compiled and combined with testing feedback from lead tester Cory Smith, who brings over a decade of experience testing running shoes for Outside. Shoes that excel in specific areas are then ranked and categorized in relation to their strengths.

Cory Smith, a former Division One runner at Villanova University, has been running since the mid-1990s. With over a decade of experience testing and reviewing running apparel and shoes for publications like Outside and Runner’s World, he continues to compete as a masters athlete, boasting a masters personal best of 4:31 in the mile at the age of 44. He consistently logs 30 to 40 miles per week on roads, trails, and the track.

.Those looking for a low-profile, flexible ride with some support might consider the Brooks Hyperion 2 GTS, which has a moderate stack height (31.5–23.5mm), responsive cushioning, and gently guides the gait with firmer, raised sidewalls alongside the rearfoot.

After dedicating countless hours to marathon training, it’s just as crucial to invest time and effort into choosing the right running shoe for race day. Unlike your everyday trainer, a marathon racing shoe must strike a balance between providing enough stability to maintain your form over 26.2 miles and offering sufficient cushioning to protect your legs from the constant impact, while not weighing you down or holding you back. Here’s what you must consider when buying the ideal marathon racing shoes.

As running shoes become thicker and softer, they can start to feel unstable and wobbly. This instability forces the stabilizing muscles in your feet and legs to work harder, which can lead to premature fatigue and even injury. To prevent this, it’s crucial to choose a marathon racing shoe that provides a stable enough platform for your stride, ensuring consistent support throughout the race, even when you grow tired and your stride becomes less efficient. Stability is built into a marathon racing shoe by using embedded plates, firmer midsoles, a widened base, and a more structured heel counter and rearfoot hold.

Cushioning refers to the perceived underfoot firmness of a running shoe. While cushioning levels are a matter of personal preference, wearing softer running shoes during the marathon can be beneficial. One 2022 study with 32 recreational runners found that wearing highly cushioned running shoes improved performance by 5.7 percent and reduced oxygen consumption by 3.2 percent during incremental treadmill tests. However, runners must balance cushioning benefits with stability and propulsion needs.

Given the length of the marathon it’s crucial to make sure your marathon racing shoes fit well. Since over the course of the 26.2 miles your feet may swell, you should make sure you have enough room in the toe box to accommodate this swelling. A good general rule of thumb is to make sure you have at least a thumb’s width of space between your longest toe and the front of the shoe. You should be able to wiggle your toes without them bumping up against the front of the shoe. While you want space for your toes to splay, the upper should hold your foot securely around the heel and instep.

While this is a highly debated topic, the current thinking is to limit the amount of time spent training in carbon fiber plated shoes. These shoes are built with a thick, highly cushioned, and unstable platform, and a rigid rocker profile. Unlike more flexible running shoes that allow your foot to move naturally, carbon fiber shoes dictate the way your feet strike the ground and roll forward, potentially altering your natural gait, which can lead to injury. In addition, the powerful bounce magnifies any instability, causing more stress on your muscles, tendons, and joints. Ideally, limit your carbon-plated shoes to race day and a few speed sessions. Super trainers—with the same high-end foams but more flexible plates—can be a great alternative for weekly speed sessions or fast-finish long runs.

The length of marathon racing shoes varies on a runner’s weight, stride efficiency, and model of shoe. Typically, lighter runners who have an efficient stride will realize longer shoe lifespans, while heavier runners who spend more time on the ground will see less. Generally speaking, you should get somewhere around 100 to 200 miles from your marathon racing shoes before the midsole begins to decompress. Visual cues, such as worn down outsole, uneven midsole compression, or holes in the upper, can be your best indicator of it being time to replace your marathon shoes. Outside of that, I’ve found if you start to question whether it’s time to replace your shoes, it’s usually time.

Angelina Alder knew she had run fast. She just didn’t know she had made history.

As the 13-year-old crossed the finish line at the 2026 Brooks PR Invitational, she immediately put both hands on her head in disbelief. Moments later, she learned what had happened: a stunning 4:38.25 mile, recognized as a world age record for 13-year-old girls.

The image of Alder standing on the track, overwhelmed by the magnitude of her performance, may become one of the defining moments of this year’s track season.

Alder is no stranger to record-breaking performances. She now holds the world age-group mile records for both 12-year-olds and 13-year-olds, an extraordinary accomplishment for an athlete who has not yet entered high school.

To appreciate the significance of her latest mark, consider that many accomplished high school runners never break five minutes for the mile. Alder not only shattered that barrier but averaged just under 70 seconds per lap while competing against some of the nation’s best young athletes.

Running excellence is deeply rooted in the Alder family. Her mother, Janeth Alder, represented Ecuador as an Olympic distance runner. Her older sisters, Carmen and Vanessa Alder, have continued the family tradition as standout runners at Brigham Young University, one of the premier distance running programs in the United States.

The Brooks PR Invitational has become one of the nation’s premier showcases for emerging talent, and Alder delivered one of the most memorable performances in the meet’s history. Her 4:38.25 places her among the fastest young female milers ever recorded and raises the bar for what is possible at age 13.

What makes the performance especially remarkable is that Alder is still years away from reaching her full physical potential. Most elite female milers do not approach their peak until late high school, college, or beyond. Yet she has already produced a time that would be competitive at major high school championships across the country.

Records at a young age never guarantee future success, but they do reveal extraordinary promise. The challenge moving forward will be patient development, smart coaching, staying healthy, and continuing to enjoy the sport.

For now, the running world can simply celebrate a remarkable achievement. Angelina Alder’s 4:38.25 mile is more than an age-group world record. It is one of those rare performances that reminds us why we love this sport. A young athlete stepped onto the track, ran beyond what seemed possible for her age, and left with a place in the record books.

Sometimes history arrives unexpectedly. At the 2026 Brooks PR Invitational, it arrived in 4 minutes, 38.25 seconds.

Yared Nuguse's remarkable Diamond League campaign continued in style on Sunday as the American star claimed his second 1500m victory of the season, producing a devastating late surge to win in Stockholm in 3:30.11.

Just one week after dictating the pace from the front in Rabat, Nuguse demonstrated an entirely different dimension to his racing arsenal in the Swedish capital. This time, the 27-year-old was forced to chase down Australia's rising star Cam Myers, who had positioned himself perfectly and appeared poised to pull off a breakthrough Diamond League victory.

For much of the race, Myers looked in control as the field navigated the final lap. But Nuguse remained composed, patiently biding his time before unleashing a powerful finishing kick on the homestretch. With every stride, the American reeled in the young Australian before sweeping past him in the closing metres to secure another impressive win on the international circuit.

The victory underlined why Nuguse has become one of the most complete middle-distance runners in the world. In Rabat, he showcased his strength and confidence by leading from the front and daring the field to catch him. In Stockholm, he displayed tactical discipline and explosive speed, proving he can win races in more than one way.

That versatility could prove crucial as the season progresses toward the major championships. Elite 1500m racing often demands athletes to adapt to unpredictable scenarios, and Nuguse is increasingly showing that he possesses every weapon required to thrive in championship-caliber fields.

For Myers, the race offered further evidence of his immense potential. The Australian pushed the pace and came agonizingly close to a career-defining victory before being denied by one of the sport's finest closers. Despite finishing second, his performance reinforced his status as one of the brightest young talents in global middle-distance running.

As for Nuguse, the result adds another prestigious Diamond League trophy to his growing collection and sends a clear message to his rivals. Whether setting the pace from the gun or hunting down leaders in the final straight, the American is proving exceptionally difficult to beat.

Two Diamond League victories. Two completely different race strategies. The same result.

Yared Nuguse is making winning look effortless.

Before sunrise breaks over Thika and before the wider athletics world begins to follow the results, a competitive field of determined runners will already be locked in a battle against the clock, their limits, and their ambitions. On Wednesday, June 10, 2026, the 57th edition of the KATA Time Trial Series returns to the quiet roads around the Kenyan Athletics Training Academy (KATA), offering athletes another invaluable opportunity to test their progress and pursue new personal bests.

While major championships often capture global headlines, events like the KATA Time Trial remain the heartbeat of athlete development in Kenya. There are no packed grandstands, dramatic presentations, or lavish celebrations. Instead, the focus is placed squarely where it belongs—on performance, discipline, and the relentless pursuit of improvement.

Over the years, the KATA Time Trial has built a reputation as one of the country's most respected performance-testing platforms. For emerging talents and experienced competitors alike, it serves as a crucial checkpoint where months of demanding training are measured against the unforgiving honesty of the stopwatch.

This edition is expected to attract athletes eager to evaluate their fitness levels and, above all, lower their personal bests. For many runners, a personal record represents far more than a number on a results sheet. It symbolizes countless kilometres covered before dawn, punishing interval sessions, sacrifices made away from competition, and the unwavering belief that hard work will eventually be rewarded.

The programme will once again feature the traditional 5km and 10km races, each presenting its own unique challenge. The 5km demands speed, courage, and the ability to sustain a relentless pace from start to finish. The 10km, meanwhile, requires patience, tactical awareness, and exceptional endurance, rewarding athletes who can distribute their effort wisely over the longer distance.

As always, intelligent pacing is expected to play a decisive role. Athletes are likely to work together through the opening kilometres, sharing the workload and maintaining consistent rhythm in pursuit of faster times. In a race where every second matters, a controlled start often proves more valuable than an aggressive surge. Those who judge their effort correctly can unlock breakthrough performances, while those who miscalculate their pace risk seeing their ambitions fade before the finish line.

The roads of Thika have witnessed countless stories of progress throughout the history of the series. Some athletes have announced their arrival with career-defining performances, while others have gained valuable lessons that later shaped future success. Every edition adds another chapter to that legacy, and the 57th installment promises to be no different.

Weather and course conditions are expected to favour athletes who combine patience with determination. The runners who remain composed during the early stages will likely be the ones producing their strongest performances when fatigue begins to take hold in the closing kilometres.

Yet beyond the times and finishing positions, the true significance of the KATA Time Trial lies in what it represents. It is a celebration of continuous growth, a proving ground for ambition, and a reminder that excellence is built through consistency rather than spectacle.

When the final watches stop on Wednesday morning, the results will reveal much more than who ran the fastest. They will tell stories of perseverance, dedication, and dreams pursued one stride at a time. For many athletes lining up in Thika, the ultimate victory will not be defeating their rivals—it will be conquering their previous best and taking another important step forward in their athletic journey.

The California International Marathon is preparing for one of the most significant transformations in its history, with organizers confirming plans to dramatically expand the race beginning in 2027. Long regarded as one of America's premier marathon courses, CIM will nearly double its capacity while giving runners more time to reach the finish line, opening the door for thousands of additional participants.

The announcement follows a new agreement involving Union Pacific, whose freight rail operations have historically influenced race-day logistics along the course. Under the new arrangement, trains will be held for a longer period, allowing organizers to extend road closures and accommodate a much larger field than ever before.

As a result, participation is expected to grow from approximately 10,000 runners to nearly 20,000 through the introduction of a second starting wave. The expansion marks a major milestone for a race that has steadily increased in popularity among both elite competitors and recreational marathoners.

Perhaps the most welcome change for many runners is the extension of the race cutoff time. For years, CIM enforced a strict six-hour limit, largely because the course needed to reopen before scheduled rail operations resumed. Beginning in 2027, that deadline will be extended to at least six hours and 45 minutes, with race organizers gaining an additional 45 minutes to an hour of road-closure time.

The revised cutoff creates new opportunities for participants who may have previously struggled to finish within the existing time restriction. More runners will now be able to complete the marathon experience without the pressure of an unusually demanding cutoff clock.

Despite the expansion, the California International Marathon will retain the characteristics that have made it one of the world's most respected marathon courses. The point-to-point route from Folsom to downtown Sacramento remains unchanged, featuring a net elevation drop of 366 feet while staying comfortably within Boston Marathon qualifying standards for downhill courses.

Combined with Northern California's typically cool early-December conditions, the course has earned a reputation as one of the fastest and most reliable venues for athletes chasing personal bests and Boston Marathon qualification marks.

That reputation is supported by impressive numbers. In 2025, more than 30 percent of CIM finishers achieved Boston-qualifying times, an extraordinary statistic that highlights the race's appeal among serious marathoners. With Boston Marathon qualifying standards becoming five minutes faster for most age groups beginning in 2026, fast and athlete-friendly courses such as CIM are expected to become even more sought after.

For runners planning their next marathon, there is no immediate change. The 2026 edition will operate under the same format that has defined the event for more than four decades. The landmark expansion—including the larger field and extended cutoff time—will officially debut in 2027.

As the California International Marathon enters a new era, organizers are balancing growth with tradition, ensuring that one of America's most celebrated road races remains both accessible and competitive. For thousands of future participants, the message is clear: there will soon be more room on the start line and more opportunity at the finish.

Kenya’s Agnes Ngetich delivered one of the most commanding performances of the road racing season on Saturday, storming to victory at the 54th Mastercard New York Mini 10K in a breathtaking course-record time of 30:07.

On a warm summer morning in Central Park, Ngetich turned what was expected to be a competitive contest into a solo exhibition of world-class distance running. The Kenyan superstar surged to the front before the second kilometer and immediately separated herself from the field, leaving her rivals with no answer to her relentless pace.

From that moment on, the race became a battle against the clock.

Passing the 5-kilometer mark in a blistering 14:57, Ngetich briefly looked capable of becoming the first woman to break the 30-minute barrier on the iconic course. However, rising temperatures, which climbed to nearly 80°F (27°C) by the finish, slowed her late-race charge. Even so, she crossed the line in 30:07, smashing the previous course record and securing one of the most memorable victories in the event's history.

The margin of victory underscored her dominance. Ethiopia’s Tsigie Gebreselama finished a distant second, 46 seconds behind the winner, while reigning champion Hellen Obiri settled for third after fading from contention.

What makes the achievement even more extraordinary is the dramatic contrast to Ngetich’s last appearance in New York.

Just three months ago, the Kenyan endured a nightmare outing at the NYC Half Marathon, where severe cold conditions left her battling hypothermia and struggling simply to reach the finish line. It was a painful experience that raised questions about what might have been on a better day.

Saturday provided a resounding answer.

Instead of fighting the elements, Ngetich embraced them, producing a performance that showcased not only her exceptional fitness but also her resilience and determination. The athlete who left New York disappointed in March returned to rewrite the record books in June.

The victory is the latest highlight in what is rapidly becoming a spectacular season for the 25-year-old. Ngetich has already captured the 2026 World Cross Country title, claimed victory at the prestigious Lille 10K, and continues to hold the women's 10-kilometer world record of 28:46, one of the fastest road performances ever recorded.

Despite the record-breaking run, Ngetich appeared remarkably relaxed after crossing the finish line.

Asked about her experience at the Mini 10K, she offered a response that perfectly reflected her strength on the day.

"It's my favorite race already. I could have run 20K."

Given the way she dismantled an elite field in Central Park, few would doubt her.

For Agnes Ngetich, New York has become a story of redemption, resilience, and record-breaking brilliance—a reminder that champions often return strongest where they once suffered their greatest setbacks.