Running News Daily

It’s time to incorporate more effort-based training into your schedule.Running is both an art and a science in many ways, and sometimes, you choose whether you want to lean into the former or the latter. Such is the case when running by feel (art) or pace (science).

Running by feel is also known as effort-based training or going by your rate of perceived exertion (RPE). “We define perceived exertion as your own subjective intensity of effort, strain, discomfort, or fatigue that you experience during exercise,” says Luke Haile, Ph.D., an associate professor in the Department of Health and Exercise Science at Commonwealth University of Pennsylvania. Your RPE is affected by numerous factors, from your emotional state to the weather to how well you slept the night before. “When you can understand it, it can really guide your training,” Haile says.

The easiest way to look at running by feel is on a scale of one to 10 (although some versions of RPE go up to 15 or 20), says Greg Laraia, a running coach at Motiv in New York City. One means you’re exercising with barely any effort at all while a 10 would be an all-out, can-barely-breathe effort. In practice, this looks like heading out to run at a six or seven for your easy runs (rather than at, say, 10-minute mile pace). 

If you know your body and your paces well, you can also run by feel sans RPE scale and just going off what an eight-minute mile ~feels~ like, for example. Experienced runners can get so good at knowing how a particular pace feels to them that they don’t even need the feedback from tech—they can simply decide that they want to run eight-minute miles and, more or less, nail it. 

But can ditching your watch and running by feel versus pace still get you to your goals? Read on to find out the pros and cons to both approaches, and how to know which is best for you. (Spoiler: Most likely, you’ll want to integrate a mix of both metrics!)

Pros of Running By Feel

“The real gift of running by feel is [that it’s] almost a mindfulness practice that, with training, allows you to feel how the body is in that moment and to take notice of how your feet feel, how your calves feel, down to your heart rate, breathing, noticing your sweating, and knowing what it feels like when you are at the right pace for a given goal,” says Haile.

The more in tune you get with your body and learn to listen to it, the more you learn when you have more to give to a run or when there’s something lurking under the surface, like an injury coming on, that isn’t allowing you to reach your full potential, Haile adds. 

Because of this, running by feel can help reduce your risk of injury or burnout, says Laraia. If you have a “bad” day but your training plan says you need to run at a higher heart rate zone or a particular pace, you might push yourself to hit that and overdo it. But if you’re running by feel, you keep your pace and heart rate in check (because it feels challenging enough). 

Cons of Running By Feel

For starters, running by feel may not be as accurate for novice runners: Haile and his team have conducted a number of experiments around RPE in both recreational and more experienced (not necessarily fast!) runners. 

“We’ll put somebody through a VO2 max test and see how hard they can actually go, then see how well they can reproduce intensities that are around that [same] anaerobic threshold because that’s really where race pace often lies,” says Haile. 

The verdict: The more experienced the runner, the better they tend to do at reproducing those same intensities. “To tell somebody that’s relatively inexperienced or beginner level to go out and sprint as hard as they can or run a 10 RPE, they might not run that hard,” says Laraia, because they don’t have context for what hard and really hard actually means. Four months later, it’s going to feel way different. (Still, he argues that this could be seen as a positive in some causes, because it shows there’s room for growth.)

Even for more experienced runners, though, accuracy varies. In one of Haile’s studies, published in the journal Perceptual Motor Skills, the 34 men involved in the research were less able to judge how hard they were actually working when running on a treadmill at relatively lower speeds and RPE, compared to working at a higher effort. Interestingly, “when intensity and RPE were higher, they had a finer perceptual acuity,” Haile says.

Another potential drawback is that it’s possible that running by feel can push runners too hard—or hold them back. “That’s where some of these other factors can come into play and cloud that mindful listening of the body,” says Haile. 

For example, maybe you’re exceeding your goal pace (or heart rate) because of some external motivational factors—like trying to run faster that your Strava friends—that are at play and this leads to overreaching. Or maybe there are emotional things going on that are causing you to feel things a little bit more physically when it’s not necessarily a physical issue. “We’ve all been in a place where emotionally it is draining and [that] doesn’t allow us to achieve what our body is actually capable of doing,” Haile says.

Finally, running by feel is more difficult to quantify. “There’s no measurable data,” Laraia says. “If you were to write down your RPE on paper, everyone’s looks the same because it’s based off the sensation that you’re feeling.”

Pros of Running by Pace

If you have a goal in mind, like a time goal for a race that’s attainable—and that’s a key word here—you want to take a more scientific approach, per Laraia. That could mean using your watch to nail a specific pace during each of your training runs. Doing so will enable you to hit the proper pace you need to achieve your race-day goal time. 

Practicing specific paces also allows you to test faster speeds and push your limits, which is important if your main goal is getting faster. If you’re running by feel all the time, it’s hard to see your progress in speed. 

As mentioned, running by pace may be the better bet for runners with less experience as it helps them to learn how it feels to stick to various paces, which they can then riff off of later in their training journey. To do that, you still want to tune into how you feel on the run, but you’re examining that based on the pace your running (rather than vice versa). Cons of Running by Pace

The main issue with this approach is that it doesn’t take into account all those aforementioned factors that can affect how you feel—physically and mentally—on a particular day. A 8:30-per-mile pace may feel easy on some days and really, really hard on others. 

“A lot of running, especially distance running, does come down to how you’re feeling mentally,” says Laraia, and he keeps this in mind when working with clients. “If they’re feeling great, by all means let’s go, but if they’re feeling shitty, I’m not going to force them to do a hard effort.” 

Again, pushing to hit a certain pace despite not feeling truly up for it can lead to injury and/or burnout. Take the long slow distance run for example: These efforts are meant to feel easy and should be done at a lower heart rate. If you’re trying to keep up with a specific pace, despite that pace actually feeling difficult, then you won’t gain the benefits of those long zone 2 efforts. 

Second, running by pace may drive runners to pursue unrealistic race goal times. With running by feel, you may realize that your original goal pace/finish time is too ambitious, and you can adjust accordingly. 

Pace vs Feel: How to Determine Which Metric Is Right for You

Everyone could probably benefit from running one or two runs per week by feel, based on all the above benefits! But just how much you lean into this artful approach depends on:

If you’re training for a race, whether it’s a 5K or a marathon, and have a particular time goal in mind, you’ll likely benefit from running most of your training runs by pace. And on race day, this becomes more important the longer the race is: “Sticking with pace early on especially is important when you don’t want to overdo it and then have nothing left or underdo it and then you have some left in the tank when the finish line’s already crossed,” Haile says. “Sometimes it seems that letting pace guide you early and then letting feel guide you later is something that works really well for runners.”

If you’re a new runner, it would be wise to opt for running by pace until you have enough runs under their belt to truly understand what various paces and efforts feel like. This is especially true if you eventually want to sign up for a race.

If you’re more experienced and/or aren’t training for a race (or don’t have a firm race-day goal), you may want to consider adding more runs by feel into your routine to benefit from the mindfulness aspect. 

Another option to add to the mix beyond running by pace versus feel would be to run based on your heart rate zones: Run your easy run at a low heart rate and your hard days in higher heart rate zones with your long runs in those middle ranges, Laraia explains. This somewhat straddles the line between running by pace and by feel as it’s more objective than the latter but more forgiving than the former. Tips for Running by Feel

Running by feel is a skill that you can improve. Haile suggests scheduling a couple of runs by feel per week, one easier and one harder, and during those sessions, pay extra attention to the different parts of your body and how you truly feel. You can’t know if a certain pace feels right, if you don’t really know what “right” is, after all. 

“When you’re really noticing it and feeling it (‘oh, that feels too fast’ or ‘this is too slow’) beyond whatever the [watch] is telling you, you can listen into your body and know that this is what is right [in this moment] given this heat or humidity or maybe this nice cool evening,” says Haile. 

Laraia also suggests taking some notes in a training journal after each run by feel. Consider how you felt at the start, middle, and end of the run and jot that down. You could then look at your watch data (even if you did not look during the run) to get a little more science- and data-driven and see where your heart rate was during each of those runs and cross-reference that with how you felt, per Laraia. Maybe mentally you felt great but your heart rate was a little elevated (for you). Having these little self check-ins is a good way to help make running by feel more accurate, Laraia explains.

“The biggest thing is just keeping in mind that it is just another tool in your toolbox versus an end-all be-all,” says Laraia. “It’s safe and it’s relatively reliable because it’s based on you, the person actually training or using it, which is great. The more time you practice and check in with yourself and either write it down or provide feedback to a coach, the better off you’ll be using it.”

Jakob Ingebrigtsen brought his remarkable 2026 season to a fitting close on home soil, winning the men’s street 1500m at the inaugural Runfest Norway in Sandnes on Friday.

Competing in front of an enthusiastic hometown crowd, the Olympic and world champion took control of the race from the early stages and maintained his authority through the finish, stopping the clock at 3:40.7.

Andreas Fjeld Halvorsen followed in second in 3:43.3, while Sigurd Tveit completed the podium in 3:47.8.

The unusual street race added another dimension to the occasion, with 273 runners taking part on the same road and sharing the course with one of Norway’s most accomplished distance runners. For the recreational participants, it offered a rare opportunity to compete alongside Ingebrigtsen in an event that brought elite athletics and mass participation together.

The victory also provided a fitting final chapter to a season that began with significant uncertainty for Ingebrigtsen. After undergoing major Achilles surgery in February, the Norwegian was forced to miss a substantial portion of the summer campaign as he worked his way back to full fitness.

His return, however, quickly developed into another championship-winning chapter. In Birmingham, Ingebrigtsen captured European 5,000m gold before adding another major title at the inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championship in Budapest, where he won the 5,000m.

Those performances transformed what could have been a disrupted season into another year defined by championship success and a determined return to the highest level.

Now, with the Sandnes victory added to his 2026 record, Ingebrigtsen closes the year exactly where it began in spirit — overcoming adversity, rebuilding his form and once again competing at the front.

From Achilles surgery in February to major championship victories and finally a 1500m win before his hometown crowd, the Norwegian has given his 2026 season a memorable final scene.

Olympic 100m hurdles champion Masai Russell has announced her engagement to longtime partner Robert “Robbie” Springfield, adding a major personal milestone to the remarkable journey of one of America’s leading track and field stars.

Russell shared the news with her followers, revealing that Springfield had proposed and that she had accepted. Reflecting on their relationship, the Olympic champion described him as her best friend and expressed her excitement about spending the rest of her life with him.

The couple’s relationship dates back to their college years at the University of Kentucky, where both were student-athletes and competed in track and field. Russell established herself as a standout hurdler, while Springfield competed in the long jump, giving them a shared understanding of the demands, sacrifices and pressures that come with pursuing success in athletics.

Springfield has since transitioned from competition into coaching. A former collegiate long jumper, he is now part of the coaching staff at Morehead State University, where he works with the programme’s sprinters and jumpers.

Their relationship has developed alongside Russell’s rise to the top of the sport. The defining moment of her career came at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games, where she captured gold in the women’s 100m hurdles, securing her place among the sport’s Olympic champions.

Away from competition, Springfield has remained a familiar part of Russell’s journey, sharing in the demanding periods of training and competition that accompanied her pursuit of Olympic success. Their connection has consequently grown from a college athletics relationship into a long-term partnership.

The engagement now marks another significant chapter for Russell, this time away from the track. After reaching the pinnacle of her sporting career in Paris, the 100m hurdles champion is beginning a new phase of her personal life alongside a partner who has been part of her journey since their university days.

From competing on the same collegiate stage to building a future together, Russell and Springfield’s story has evolved alongside two careers shaped by track and field. The Olympic champion will now balance this new personal chapter with her continuing ambitions in athletics

The women’s race at the 2026 TCS Amsterdam Marathon is shaping up to be one of the most competitive editions in recent years, with a deep international field set to take on the fast Dutch course on Sunday, October 18.

At the centre of the contest will be four Ethiopian athletes who have already broken the 2:20 barrier, creating the prospect of a fascinating battle for victory and a possible assault on the course record of 2:16:52.

Defending champion Aynalem Desta will return to Amsterdam looking to retain her title after producing the biggest performance of her career at last year’s 50th edition. Desta won in a personal best of 2:17:37, establishing herself among the leading marathoners in the field and setting the benchmark for this year’s contenders.

Standing in her way will be fellow Ethiopian Meseret Belete Tola, a former Amsterdam champion who knows exactly what it takes to succeed on the course. Belete Tola captured the 2023 edition in 2:18:21, and her return adds another layer of experience and proven quality to an already formidable lineup.

The field also includes Mestawut Fikir Truneh, who arrives with an impressive marathon pedigree. Truneh finished runner-up at the 2024 Berlin Marathon in 2:18:48, demonstrating her ability to compete at the highest level on one of the world's major marathon stages.

Completing the quartet of sub-2:20 Ethiopians is Buze Diriba, whose personal best of 2:19:34 places her firmly among the leading contenders. With four athletes possessing credentials below 2:20, the race is likely to develop into a tightly contested battle from the opening kilometres.

The depth extends well beyond the leading quartet. Desi Jisa Mokonin, representing Bahrain, Yeshi Kalayu Chekole of Ethiopia and Nazret Weldu Gebrehiwet of Eritrea have all established themselves as serious marathon competitors with performances approaching the 2:20 mark.

Another major name to watch is Abeba Aregawi, the former 1500m world champion representing Sweden. Aregawi has successfully transferred her talents to the marathon and made headlines earlier this year by setting a Swedish national record of 2:23:12 on her debut. Her presence adds another intriguing dimension to an already high-quality field.

Amsterdam’s marathon course has consistently provided an opportunity for elite athletes to produce fast times, and this year’s women’s lineup has the depth to turn the race into a genuine test of both championship racing and outright speed.

With four athletes already inside 2:20, two former Amsterdam champions returning to the start line and several other accomplished marathoners ready to challenge them, the battle is expected to remain open deep into the race.

The ultimate target will be the Amsterdam women’s course record of 2:16:52. Whether the leading contenders can threaten that mark remains to be seen, but the quality assembled for October 18 ensures that the record will be firmly in the spotlight when the race reaches its spectacular finish inside the Olympic Stadium.

The 2026 Valencia Half Marathon is shaping up to be a thrilling contest of speed, endurance and tactical brilliance, with some of the world’s finest road runners set to converge in Spain on October 25.

Kenya’s Daniel Ebenyo and Alex Matata will be among the leading contenders, facing a formidable Ethiopian challenge spearheaded by Jemal Yimer and Tadese Worku. The field also features Rodrigue Kwizera, who boasts the fastest personal best among the leading entrants at 58:16.

Ebenyo arrives with a personal best of 59:04, placing him firmly among the athletes capable of sustaining a demanding pace over the 21.1-kilometre distance. Matata, who owns a 59:11 best, adds further Kenyan strength, while Andrea Kiptoo brings another sub-60-minute credential to the race.

Yimer has already established himself as one of the fastest athletes in the field with a 58:33 personal best, while Worku has clocked 58:35. Kenya’s Owen Korir, with a best of 58:58, further underlines the remarkable depth of the men's lineup.

Valencia Half Marathon 2026 Entries

1. Rodrigue Kwizera (Spain) — 58:16

2. Jemal Yimer (Ethiopia) — 58:33

3. Tadese Worku (Ethiopia) — 58:35

4. Owen Korir (Kenya) — 58:58

5. Daniel Ebenyo (Kenya) — 59:04

6. Alex Matata (Kenya) — 59:11

7. Andrea Kiptoo (Kenya) — 59:11

8. Thierry Ndikumwenayo (Spain) — 59:42

9. Said Mechaal (Spain) — 1:00:24

10. Adel Mechaal (Spain) — 1:02:30

Kwizera, who finished second in Valencia last year, leads the field on paper and will be seeking another standout performance on the famously fast Valencia course. With several athletes carrying sub-60-minute credentials, the race has the ingredients for an aggressive battle from the opening kilometres.

Beyond the headline names, the men’s field is deep and highly competitive, bringing together a strong collection of experienced international athletes with proven ability over the half-marathon distance. With so much quality packed into the lineup, the race promises an intriguing battle in which tactics, endurance, positioning and finishing speed could all play a crucial role in determining the eventual champion.

Yet personal bests will count for little once the gun goes off. The title could ultimately be decided by patience, positioning and the ability to respond when the pace begins to rise in the closing stages. Every surge, every tactical move and every second saved could prove decisive on the road to the finish.

With Kenya, Ethiopia and Spain represented by athletes of exceptional quality, Valencia promises a high-octane men's showdown in which the leaders are likely to be separated by only a handful of seconds. The final kilometres could provide the defining moments of a race packed with speed, ambition and anticipation.

On October 25, the question will be simple: who has the strength to command the streets of Valencia and claim the coveted half-marathon crown?

 

April 19, 1982. The Boston Marathon unfolded under unusually warm, sunny conditions, and by the closing stages, the race had become a private battle between two very different American runners: Alberto Salazar, already one of the biggest names in distance running, and Dick Beardsley, the Minnesota runner who had emerged as a serious marathon contender.

For roughly nine miles, from the Newton Hills toward the finish, Beardsley did much of the leading, with Salazar tucked close behind. Neither man could shake the other. They ran deep into Boston locked together, trading surges and refusing to surrender an inch as the crowds along the course grew louder.

Salazar finally made his decisive move with less than a mile remaining. He opened a small gap, but Beardsley refused to disappear. The Minnesota runner chased him through the final streets, closing again as they approached the finish.

Then came the final sprint.

Salazar held his form and reached the finish first in 2:08:52, with Beardsley only two seconds behind in 2:08:54. It was an extraordinary result: both men broke 2:09 in the same Boston Marathon, and both shattered the previous course record.

The race became known as the “Duel in the Sun,” and it remains one of the most celebrated head-to-head battles in Boston Marathon history. Beardsley had not won, but his performance established him as one of America's elite marathoners.

For Salazar, however, victory came at an enormous physical cost. Immediately after crossing the finish line, he collapsed and required emergency treatment, including several litres of intravenous saline. The combination of heat, dehydration and an all-out effort had pushed his body to the limit.

Salazar's marathon career would never again produce quite the same kind of performance. His celebrated 1981 New York City Marathon victory had produced what was initially considered a world record, although the course was later found to be short. His Boston triumph therefore became one of the defining victories of his career.

Beardsley's story would take an even more difficult turn. Injuries disrupted his career, and after returning to the highest level, he suffered a devastating farm accident in 1989. Further accidents, surgeries and severe physical pain followed, eventually leading to a long battle with painkiller addiction.

He eventually overcame that struggle and transformed the darkest chapters of his life into a story of recovery, resilience and redemption.

That is what makes the 1982 Boston Marathon more than a two-second victory.

For one extraordinary afternoon, Salazar and Beardsley produced a marathon duel in which neither man was willing to give way. One crossed the finish line first. The other finished only two seconds behind him.

Two seconds separated them at Boston. Decades later, their legendary duel remains one of the greatest chapters in marathon history.