Running News Daily

It’s time to incorporate more effort-based training into your schedule.Running is both an art and a science in many ways, and sometimes, you choose whether you want to lean into the former or the latter. Such is the case when running by feel (art) or pace (science).

Running by feel is also known as effort-based training or going by your rate of perceived exertion (RPE). “We define perceived exertion as your own subjective intensity of effort, strain, discomfort, or fatigue that you experience during exercise,” says Luke Haile, Ph.D., an associate professor in the Department of Health and Exercise Science at Commonwealth University of Pennsylvania. Your RPE is affected by numerous factors, from your emotional state to the weather to how well you slept the night before. “When you can understand it, it can really guide your training,” Haile says.

The easiest way to look at running by feel is on a scale of one to 10 (although some versions of RPE go up to 15 or 20), says Greg Laraia, a running coach at Motiv in New York City. One means you’re exercising with barely any effort at all while a 10 would be an all-out, can-barely-breathe effort. In practice, this looks like heading out to run at a six or seven for your easy runs (rather than at, say, 10-minute mile pace). 

If you know your body and your paces well, you can also run by feel sans RPE scale and just going off what an eight-minute mile ~feels~ like, for example. Experienced runners can get so good at knowing how a particular pace feels to them that they don’t even need the feedback from tech—they can simply decide that they want to run eight-minute miles and, more or less, nail it. 

But can ditching your watch and running by feel versus pace still get you to your goals? Read on to find out the pros and cons to both approaches, and how to know which is best for you. (Spoiler: Most likely, you’ll want to integrate a mix of both metrics!)

Pros of Running By Feel

“The real gift of running by feel is [that it’s] almost a mindfulness practice that, with training, allows you to feel how the body is in that moment and to take notice of how your feet feel, how your calves feel, down to your heart rate, breathing, noticing your sweating, and knowing what it feels like when you are at the right pace for a given goal,” says Haile.

The more in tune you get with your body and learn to listen to it, the more you learn when you have more to give to a run or when there’s something lurking under the surface, like an injury coming on, that isn’t allowing you to reach your full potential, Haile adds. 

Because of this, running by feel can help reduce your risk of injury or burnout, says Laraia. If you have a “bad” day but your training plan says you need to run at a higher heart rate zone or a particular pace, you might push yourself to hit that and overdo it. But if you’re running by feel, you keep your pace and heart rate in check (because it feels challenging enough). 

Cons of Running By Feel

For starters, running by feel may not be as accurate for novice runners: Haile and his team have conducted a number of experiments around RPE in both recreational and more experienced (not necessarily fast!) runners. 

“We’ll put somebody through a VO2 max test and see how hard they can actually go, then see how well they can reproduce intensities that are around that [same] anaerobic threshold because that’s really where race pace often lies,” says Haile. 

The verdict: The more experienced the runner, the better they tend to do at reproducing those same intensities. “To tell somebody that’s relatively inexperienced or beginner level to go out and sprint as hard as they can or run a 10 RPE, they might not run that hard,” says Laraia, because they don’t have context for what hard and really hard actually means. Four months later, it’s going to feel way different. (Still, he argues that this could be seen as a positive in some causes, because it shows there’s room for growth.)

Even for more experienced runners, though, accuracy varies. In one of Haile’s studies, published in the journal Perceptual Motor Skills, the 34 men involved in the research were less able to judge how hard they were actually working when running on a treadmill at relatively lower speeds and RPE, compared to working at a higher effort. Interestingly, “when intensity and RPE were higher, they had a finer perceptual acuity,” Haile says.

Another potential drawback is that it’s possible that running by feel can push runners too hard—or hold them back. “That’s where some of these other factors can come into play and cloud that mindful listening of the body,” says Haile. 

For example, maybe you’re exceeding your goal pace (or heart rate) because of some external motivational factors—like trying to run faster that your Strava friends—that are at play and this leads to overreaching. Or maybe there are emotional things going on that are causing you to feel things a little bit more physically when it’s not necessarily a physical issue. “We’ve all been in a place where emotionally it is draining and [that] doesn’t allow us to achieve what our body is actually capable of doing,” Haile says.

Finally, running by feel is more difficult to quantify. “There’s no measurable data,” Laraia says. “If you were to write down your RPE on paper, everyone’s looks the same because it’s based off the sensation that you’re feeling.”

Pros of Running by Pace

If you have a goal in mind, like a time goal for a race that’s attainable—and that’s a key word here—you want to take a more scientific approach, per Laraia. That could mean using your watch to nail a specific pace during each of your training runs. Doing so will enable you to hit the proper pace you need to achieve your race-day goal time. 

Practicing specific paces also allows you to test faster speeds and push your limits, which is important if your main goal is getting faster. If you’re running by feel all the time, it’s hard to see your progress in speed. 

As mentioned, running by pace may be the better bet for runners with less experience as it helps them to learn how it feels to stick to various paces, which they can then riff off of later in their training journey. To do that, you still want to tune into how you feel on the run, but you’re examining that based on the pace your running (rather than vice versa). Cons of Running by Pace

The main issue with this approach is that it doesn’t take into account all those aforementioned factors that can affect how you feel—physically and mentally—on a particular day. A 8:30-per-mile pace may feel easy on some days and really, really hard on others. 

“A lot of running, especially distance running, does come down to how you’re feeling mentally,” says Laraia, and he keeps this in mind when working with clients. “If they’re feeling great, by all means let’s go, but if they’re feeling shitty, I’m not going to force them to do a hard effort.” 

Again, pushing to hit a certain pace despite not feeling truly up for it can lead to injury and/or burnout. Take the long slow distance run for example: These efforts are meant to feel easy and should be done at a lower heart rate. If you’re trying to keep up with a specific pace, despite that pace actually feeling difficult, then you won’t gain the benefits of those long zone 2 efforts. 

Second, running by pace may drive runners to pursue unrealistic race goal times. With running by feel, you may realize that your original goal pace/finish time is too ambitious, and you can adjust accordingly. 

Pace vs Feel: How to Determine Which Metric Is Right for You

Everyone could probably benefit from running one or two runs per week by feel, based on all the above benefits! But just how much you lean into this artful approach depends on:

If you’re training for a race, whether it’s a 5K or a marathon, and have a particular time goal in mind, you’ll likely benefit from running most of your training runs by pace. And on race day, this becomes more important the longer the race is: “Sticking with pace early on especially is important when you don’t want to overdo it and then have nothing left or underdo it and then you have some left in the tank when the finish line’s already crossed,” Haile says. “Sometimes it seems that letting pace guide you early and then letting feel guide you later is something that works really well for runners.”

If you’re a new runner, it would be wise to opt for running by pace until you have enough runs under their belt to truly understand what various paces and efforts feel like. This is especially true if you eventually want to sign up for a race.

If you’re more experienced and/or aren’t training for a race (or don’t have a firm race-day goal), you may want to consider adding more runs by feel into your routine to benefit from the mindfulness aspect. 

Another option to add to the mix beyond running by pace versus feel would be to run based on your heart rate zones: Run your easy run at a low heart rate and your hard days in higher heart rate zones with your long runs in those middle ranges, Laraia explains. This somewhat straddles the line between running by pace and by feel as it’s more objective than the latter but more forgiving than the former. Tips for Running by Feel

Running by feel is a skill that you can improve. Haile suggests scheduling a couple of runs by feel per week, one easier and one harder, and during those sessions, pay extra attention to the different parts of your body and how you truly feel. You can’t know if a certain pace feels right, if you don’t really know what “right” is, after all. 

“When you’re really noticing it and feeling it (‘oh, that feels too fast’ or ‘this is too slow’) beyond whatever the [watch] is telling you, you can listen into your body and know that this is what is right [in this moment] given this heat or humidity or maybe this nice cool evening,” says Haile. 

Laraia also suggests taking some notes in a training journal after each run by feel. Consider how you felt at the start, middle, and end of the run and jot that down. You could then look at your watch data (even if you did not look during the run) to get a little more science- and data-driven and see where your heart rate was during each of those runs and cross-reference that with how you felt, per Laraia. Maybe mentally you felt great but your heart rate was a little elevated (for you). Having these little self check-ins is a good way to help make running by feel more accurate, Laraia explains.

“The biggest thing is just keeping in mind that it is just another tool in your toolbox versus an end-all be-all,” says Laraia. “It’s safe and it’s relatively reliable because it’s based on you, the person actually training or using it, which is great. The more time you practice and check in with yourself and either write it down or provide feedback to a coach, the better off you’ll be using it.”

Melissa Jefferson-Wooden delivered a sensational performance in Budapest, storming to victory in the women’s 100m at the inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championship in a breathtaking 10.62 seconds.

The American produced a superb display of acceleration and composure to claim the World Ultimate Championship title while recording the fastest women’s 100m time in the world this year. Her 10.62 mark underlined her exceptional form and placed her firmly at the top of the global sprinting hierarchy.

Jefferson-Wooden controlled the race through the decisive stages and maintained her form all the way to the finish to secure a statement victory against a field packed with championship pedigree. She crossed the line ahead of Olympic champion Julien Alfred, who clocked 10.74 seconds with a -0.2 m/s wind, while Sha’Carri Richardson took third in 10.76.

Women’s 100m Final

1. Melissa Jefferson-Wooden — 10.62

2. Julien Alfred — 10.74 (-0.2 m/s)

3. Sha’Carri Richardson — 10.76

The victory was especially significant given the quality of the opposition. Jefferson-Wooden held her nerve against Alfred and Richardson, two of the most accomplished sprinters of the current generation, to produce the fastest performance in the world this year when it mattered most.

Alfred once again demonstrated her consistency at the highest level by taking silver, while Richardson completed an all-star podium in a race that brought together three of the biggest names in women’s sprinting.

But beyond the time, the title and the celebration, one of the most touching moments came after the race when Jefferson-Wooden embraced her father, Melvin, in an emotional celebration.

Their moment carried a deeply personal meaning. When Melissa was just 17 years old, she donated her stem cells to help her father undergo a bone marrow transplant after he was diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome. Years later, the two shared an unforgettable embrace in Budapest after she had become the World Ultimate Champion.

For Jefferson-Wooden, however, the evening was about far more than a medal. It was the culmination of an extraordinary journey, now highlighted by a world-leading 10.62 seconds on one of the biggest stages in athletics.

With the Ultimate Championship title secured and her father by her side, Jefferson-Wooden leaves Budapest with more than being an ultimate champion. She leaves with momentum, confidence and a powerful statement of intent — turning a high-profile showdown into one of the defining sprint performances of her season.

Audrey Werro has added another major title to her extraordinary season, storming to victory in the women’s 800m at the inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championships in Budapest.

The Swiss star delivered a commanding performance, taking control from the opening gun and refusing to surrender the lead as she powered through an absorbing battle against two of the biggest names in the event.

Werro stopped the clock at 1:55.88 to become the Ultimate Championships 800m champion, producing another statement performance on one of the sport’s newest and most prestigious stages.

Behind her, Great Britain’s Keely Hodgkinson fought her way to second in 1:56.26, while the Netherlands’ Femke Broeders-Bol completed the podium in 1:56.74.

The result once again brought together the same formidable trio that featured on the podium at the European Championships, but Werro again proved to be the athlete who could rise above the challenge when it mattered most.

Her Budapest triumph is the latest chapter in a season that has already included records, a successful Diamond League Trophy defence and European Championship gold. Now, she can add the Ultimate Championships crown to a growing list of accomplishments.

Werro’s consistency has been particularly impressive in an 800m event packed with elite talent. Rather than simply relying on a fast finish, the Swiss athlete showed her authority by taking the initiative from the beginning and maintaining enough strength and composure to hold off Hodgkinson and Broeders-Bol all the way to the line.

The victory also underlined the remarkable depth of the women’s 800m, with three athletes separated by less than a second at the finish. Hodgkinson’s 1:56.26 and Broeders-Bol’s 1:56.74 showed just how fiercely contested the race was, but Werro’s decision to dictate the pace ultimately gave her the decisive advantage.

For Werro, this was more than another medal. It was another opportunity to demonstrate that her rise is no passing moment. On a stage featuring established champions and elite rivals, she once again produced the performance required to claim the biggest prize.

For Hodgkinson, the silver medal adds another major podium finish, while Broeders-Bol once again demonstrated her ability to compete with the very best over two laps.

But the spotlight in Budapest belonged unmistakably to Werro.

With another championship crown secured, the Swiss star has strengthened her claim as the athlete setting the standard in women’s 800m running. This is Audrey Werro’s era — and the rest of the field is chasing.

Busang Collen Kebinatshipi has delivered another sensational performance, storming to victory in the men’s 400m at the inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championship in Budapest.

The reigning world champion stopped the clock at an astonishing 43.39 seconds, smashing his own Botswana national record and moving to fifth on the world all-time list.

Kebinatshipi produced a commanding finish to pull away from his rivals and secure the Ultimate Championship title. American star Rai Benjamin finished second in 44.15, while Jereem Richards of Trinidad and Tobago completed the podium in 44.23.

 Men’s 400m

1. Busang Collen Kebinatshipi — 43.39 NR

2. Rai Benjamin — 44.15

3. Jereem Richards — 44.23

The performance is even more remarkable considering that Kebinatshipi had already rewritten the Botswana record just one week ago in Brussels, where he ran 43.40. In Budapest, he lowered that mark by another 0.01 seconds to establish a new national record of 43.39.

That improvement has also propelled the 22-year-old into rare territory. His latest time now ranks him fifth fastest in history over 400m, placing him among an extraordinary group of athletes who have broken the 43.40 barrier.

Kebinatshipi's victory also caps an extraordinary season for the Botswana star. After establishing himself as a global champion, he has continued to demonstrate that he belongs among the very best one-lap runners in the world.

And there is a major reward for his historic night in Budapest: Kebinatshipi walks away as the Ultimate Champion and $150,000 richer.

From another national record to a place among the five fastest 400m runners ever, Kebinatshipi has turned an already remarkable season into something truly special.

Botswana has its latest sprinting superstar — and Kebinatshipi is showing that his ceiling may be even higher than anyone imagined. 

Marileidy Paulino once again proved why she is the undisputed queen of the one-lap event, powering to victory in the women’s 400m at the inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championship in Budapest.

The Dominican Republic superstar produced a sensational 49.07 seconds to claim gold, pulling decisively away in the final straight and holding off a fiercely competitive field to extend her remarkable unbeaten run.

Paulino delivered her trademark combination of controlled speed and devastating finishing strength. She remained firmly in contention through the opening stages before unleashing her decisive move down the home straight, where she quickly opened a gap on her closest challengers.

Norway’s Henriette Jæger mounted a strong challenge but could not match Paulino’s finishing speed, crossing the line second in an impressive 49.28. Jamaica’s Nickisha Pryce completed the podium after clocking 49.56, ensuring that three of the world’s leading 400m talents occupied the medals.

The result once again underlined Paulino’s extraordinary consistency at the highest level. She entered Budapest as the world leader after running 48.48 in Paris in June, a performance that also set a Diamond League record. She subsequently remained unbeaten throughout her Diamond League campaign, closing the circuit with a meeting-record 48.64 in Brussels.

Budapest has also become a special venue in Paulino’s career. Three years ago, at the same National Athletics Centre, she captured her first individual world title, marking the beginning of another dominant chapter in her career. She later added Olympic gold in Paris in 2024, further establishing herself among the defining 400m athletes of her generation.

The inaugural World Athletics Ultimate Championship has brought together the sport’s biggest stars in a new winner-takes-the-spotlight format, with Olympic and world champions, Diamond League winners and leading performers competing for ultimate honours.

For Paulino, the occasion once again ended with Ultimate Crown on her arms.

With 49.07 seconds, she did more than win another major 400m title. She delivered another statement of authority, powering through the final straight with the confidence and speed that have made her one of the most dominant figures in modern women’s athletics.

Marileidy Paulino remains unbeaten, remains relentless and, once again, remains the queen of the one lap.

Jakob Ingebrigtsen has made a major decision regarding the remainder of his World Athletics Ultimate Championship campaign, confirming that he will withdraw from the men’s 1500m in Budapest despite producing a sensational performance to win the 5,000m title.

The Norwegian superstar stormed to victory in the inaugural Ultimate Championship 5,000m on Friday night, clocking a season-best 12:59.24 and delivering a devastating finishing kick to defeat Olympic 5,000m champion Cole Hocker and American Parker Wolfe.

Ingebrigtsen’s final 100 metres was arguably the defining moment of the race. The Olympic champion produced a remarkable 12.60-second closing 100m, powering away from the field to secure the $150,000 winner’s prize and underline just how far his fitness has progressed since returning from Achilles surgery.

The victory was particularly significant after what has been an extremely difficult period for the 25-year-old. Earlier in the season, Ingebrigtsen faced serious uncertainty over whether he would even be able to compete at the highest level again. His return has gradually gathered momentum, and his performance in Budapest offered perhaps the clearest indication yet that the Norwegian is rediscovering his formidable racing ability.

But rather than risk pushing his recovering body further, Ingebrigtsen has now opted to step away from the 1500m.

The decision means the highly anticipated showdown with British rival Josh Kerr will not take place in Budapest after all. The two stars had been expected to renew one of the biggest rivalries in modern middle-distance running in the 1500m final.

Instead, Ingebrigtsen is looking beyond the immediate opportunity and towards the bigger picture.

“I’m thinking about 2027… Fitness cannot be faked,” the Norwegian said, signalling that protecting his long-term condition has become more important than chasing another major victory only days after his return to peak-level competition.

The decision comes just one week after an emotionally charged Diamond League Final in Brussels, where Ingebrigtsen finished fourth in the 1500m behind Australia’s Cameron Myers, Kenya’s Phanuel Kipkosgei Koech and American Ethan Strand.

After that race, Ingebrigtsen delivered a fiery assessment of his rivals and questioned the tactics surrounding the pacemaking, particularly involving Hocker. He later acknowledged that there had been “a little too much adrenaline and emotion” when microphones were placed in front of him immediately after the race.

Yet his latest decision shows that beneath the emotion and competitive intensity lies a longer-term strategy.

Ingebrigtsen has already demonstrated that he can compete at an elite level again. His 12:59.24 in Budapest was not simply a victory — it was a statement that the Norwegian remains capable of producing a world-class finish even after months of injury rehabilitation.

Now, however, he is choosing not to gamble with that progress.

For a runner who has spent much of the year fighting his way back from injury, another 1500m race could have offered enormous rewards but also carried unnecessary risk. By withdrawing, Ingebrigtsen is effectively prioritising longevity over one more opportunity for immediate glory.

His message is clear: the comeback is underway, but it will not be rushed.

The 5,000m victory has given Ingebrigtsen confidence, momentum and perhaps, most importantly, proof that his body can once again handle elite competition.

Now comes the harder part — knowing when to stop.

With 2027 already firmly in his sights, the Norwegian has chosen recovery over risk. And after everything he has endured, that could ultimately prove to be one of the most important decisions of his comeback.

Jakob Ingebrigtsen is not walking away from the sport. He is protecting his future in it.