The Rush to Discredit Greatness – Why Do We Doubt Record-Breaking Performances?

By Bob Anderson, Editor of My Best Runs

When news broke that Jacob Kiplimo had run an astonishing 56:41 half marathon, the immediate reaction on social media was a mix of awe, skepticism, and outright accusations of cheating. Many simply couldn’t believe that a human could run that fast.

I understand why people might be shocked. This was not just a fast race—it was arguably the greatest distance running performance ever. Kiplimo’s time shattered previous records and redefined what we thought was possible over 21K. But should disbelief automatically lead to accusations?

The reality of record-breaking feats

Throughout history, incredible performances have often been met with doubt. In 1954, Roger Bannister’s sub-4-minute mile seemed superhuman, but today, elite high schoolers chase that mark. When Eliud Kipchoge broke the two-hour marathon barrier (albeit in a controlled environment), people debated how much was due to pacing, shoes, or course setup.

Now, with Kiplimo’s 56:41, we see the same pattern. Questions arise:

Was the course accurate? This will be verified before the record is ratified.

Did he use performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs)? As far as we know, he has passed every drug test, and accusations without evidence are unfair.

What about Nike’s super shoes? Yes, he wore them, but these shoes are legal under World Athletics regulations.

These are reasonable questions to ask, and the governing bodies will do their due diligence. But what’s frustrating is the knee-jerk reaction of immediately assuming foul play.

The culture of doubt in modern running

Why do some past champions and fans rush to discredit new performances? Some of it comes from personal experience—many former elite runners trained incredibly hard, and when they see times they never thought possible, it’s natural to wonder what changed. Some of it also comes from a real history of doping scandals in the sport, from Ben Johnson to Lance Armstrong to the Russian state-sponsored program.

But there’s another factor—social media. Unlike in Bannister’s era, when skepticism was confined to private conversations, today’s doubts explode instantly across the internet. A single tweet suggesting “this must be doping” spreads like wildfire, often without evidence.

Jacob Kiplimo is no stranger to records

Let’s not forget that this is not Kiplimo’s first world record. He has been at the top of the sport for years, previously holding the half marathon world record at 57:31 before Kelvin Kiptum broke it. He has consistently performed at the highest level, winning Olympic and World Championships medals. Are the same people suggesting he cheated back then too? Or is it only now, when the record has taken a dramatic leap, that they feel the need to discredit him?

Innocent until proven guilty

In sports, as in life, we must be careful about making baseless accusations. If evidence emerges that Kiplimo cheated, that’s one thing. But until then, we should celebrate an incredible performance and let the process of verification take its course.

To those quick to assume wrongdoing, I ask—what if you’re wrong? What if Kiplimo is simply that good? Greatness should inspire us, not immediately make us suspicious. Until proven otherwise, this was a historic day for distance running—one that deserves recognition, not reckless doubt.

posted Sunday February 16th
by Bob Anderson