Zapping Calf Muscle to Cut Runner Injuries | Orthopedics This Week
Sports Medicine

Zapping Calf Muscle to Cut Runner Injuries

Source: Wikimedia commons and Uri Lenz

"Studies show that heel runners have an overall injury rate that is approximately twice as high compared to forefoot runners," claims computer science Professor Dr. Antonio Krüger, at Saarland University in Saarbrücken, Germany.

Krüger also questions whether runners can learn a new movement through information technology alone.

"An effective analysis of running technique can only be provided by professionals or expert coaches using slow-motion videos. Amateur athletes have no access to this. However, as more and more people run long distances, exposing themselves to the risk of knee injuries and stress fractures, answering this question is more necessary than ever before,” he says.

Krüger’s contribution to answering that question is a device he invented called the “Footstriker.”

As he explains, the device “is worn by the runner on the body and ensures the correct movement with the help of electro-stimulation (EMS). The painless electrical surge come from electrodes that the runner sticks to his calf. The runner also carries the necessary EMS generator and the control unit, an Arduino microcontroller, on his body. In the shoes are insoles that are equipped with pressure sensors. The sensors allow researchers to see not only whether the runner is striking with the heel, middle or forefoot, but also whether the foot is straight on the ground or in the air. If the foot is in the air and the heel has previously been recognized, the control unit sends a faint, painless current into the calf muscle which moves the foot forward. The runner now strikes with the middle or forefoot, protecting his health and running more efficiently.”

The computer scientists have tested their running assistant on 18 people between the ages of 24 and 36 years. They claim “that using Footstriker during a run over three kilometers leads to significantly fewer heel-first strikes compared to the voice commands of a personal trainer.”

"After the run with Footstriker we interviewed the runners. The result: They could describe the new, correct movement in their own words, although we had not provided any information about it. Obviously, they had learned it only with the help of the running assistant," reports Krüger.

Advertisement

Share Your Thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Advertisement